CURRICULUM AND METHODS OF TEACHING FOR RETARDED CHILDREN IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOL (2)
The report of the Joint Committee on Mental Deficiency rightly lays stress on the fact that much further research is required on the subject of suitable curricula and methods of teaching for retarded children. There is no doubt that excellent work in this field is being done in a number of individual schools, but hardly any attempt has been made up to the present to pool the experience thus acquired. Further inquiry and research are urgently needed. In general, it may be said that the problem of devising a suitable curriculum for the retarded children has not advanced much beyond the experimental stage. The experience hitherto acquired has been admirably summarised by Professor Burt in a Report on Provision for Backward Children which was published by the London County Council in 1925, and which has been reprinted, in part, as Appendix A to the Board's Handbook of Suggestions for Teachers (1927).
(1) See also Chapter X, page 130, and Chapter XI, No. 68.
(2) This section does not refer to the 'more retarded' or 'educably defective' pupils who are transferred to 'special schools'.
[page 204]
Curriculum
It seems to be generally agreed that the curriculum for the retarded child should differ not only in range but also in quality from the curriculum in vogue for the ordinary classes for normal children.
(a) Range. The aims in view must not be too ambitious. In the ordinary curriculum much of the work in the lower classes or groups is really preparatory to work in the higher classes. For the type of retarded child who is innately dull, work which has no intrinsic value of itself and merely prepares the way for more advanced studies should be excluded from the curriculum. His work in all branches of the curriculum should be directly related to the comparatively simple needs of his after life. For example, he should not be troubled with the spelling of words which he will never think of using in his written work.
The retarded child will progress at a pace which at best will be only three-quarters the rate of the normal child, and at worst little more than half that rate. It is accordingly useless to attempt to cover the same ground with him as would be covered by the normal child in the same period of time. In order to do so, the work would have to be done superficially and nothing would be thoroughly learnt. Further, it is now generally agreed that for retarded children more time should be allotted to lessons of a less formal character.
(b) Character. More formal and abstract aspects of the various branches of the curriculum should not figure prominently in the work for retarded children. The topics dealt with in the lessons should be practical and concrete and book and paper work should be greatly reduced. Ordinary text-books are, as a rule, unsuitable for use with such children. A child of the age of nine or ten who is backward in reading needs words that are suited to an infant of the age of seven, but he will scorn the babyish style and content of the conventional infant primer. In the same way, the ordinary arithmetic books often contain too many difficult problems and not enough simple mechanical exercises to impress the fundamental rules on retarded pupils. In the best organised classes for retarded children, the teacher, often with the aid of his pupils, makes reading books and arithmetic tests of his own.
[page 205]
Most retarded children are visualisers, and understand by seeing and by doing. They learn reading and spelling best by the 'look and say' or 'word-whole' method, and are usually perplexed by a purely phonic approach. In general, their grasp of words, whether written, printed or spoken is limited and weak. Hence, instruction of the lecture type is unsuitable for them; their written composition should be greatly reduced, and it is desirable that the classroom should be equipped with visual and manual aids of different kinds. The children should not merely be told about things, but should also see them. Above all, instead of being trained to sit still, they should be constantly active, on their feet, and with their hands. This implies that muscular movement should figure largely in the curriculum - handwork of different types, physical exercises, dancing, simple hobbies, and organised and unorganised games. Even the more formal branches of the curriculum should be taught through movement rather than through the unaided eye or ear, and the need for reading or arithmetic should arise naturally out of the difficulties or problems connected with manual and creative work. It must not, however, be assumed that handwork is in itself a panacea. It is certainly an easy way of keeping the retarded child occupied, concentrated or apparently concentrated on a definite task, with something to show for it at the end. Yet to exercise the hands is not necessarily to exercise the brain as a whole; and monotonous forms of handwork - such as knitting, plaiting, weaving, threading beads, and the like - which require little or no thought, may leave the child torpid or daydreaming. Some innately dull children, too, are as inapt in manual work as they are in intellectual work. The actual type of handwork, therefore, should be carefully graded to suit the needs and capacities of each individual, and judiciously chosen and arranged so as to widen interest, stimulate thinking, and bear closely upon other work.
Above all, in every branch of the curriculum and at every stage the problems and the tasks that are put before the child should be well within his powers, and yet sufficient to evoke some mental effort. Instead of feeling that he is the dunce of his class, failing every day at whatever task he is given, he should experience the joy of successful work and the satisfaction of something achieved. If the product of the child's work is not only a visible well-finished job, but an embodiment of his own simple creative and aesthetic tastes, his character as well as his intelligence will be simultaneously trained.
[page 206]
Teaching Methods
The old idea that intellectual exercises, however dull and incomprehensible, may nevertheless provide a wholesome mental gymnastic, has long ago been exploded and is least of all applicable to dull or backward children. The teacher will not improve the dull child's memory simply by keeping him memorising. (1) On the other hand, just because the dull child's memory is weak, he will undoubtedly need more 'drill' in certain subjects; but this should be always drill on something that in itself is useful. One outstanding defect of the innately dull child is his lack of attention; the best way to awaken attention is to arouse interest. At every moment, therefore, the teacher should be appealing to the natural interests of the child. Forcing him to work at a task which he neither likes nor understands is worse than useless.
The dull child is as a rule singularly slow in talking in front of the class and the teacher. He has little to say, and does not know how to say it. In the past what he has ventured has seemed stupid to others, and he has thus grown shy and and monosyllabic. Simple homely talks, story telling, dramatic work and the like, might be freely used in the lower classes to draw the dull child out of his shell.
Individual guidance and attention will be almost indispensable. Retarded children differ far more amongst themselves than normal children. Hence explanations may often have to be elaborated for each particular child, and patiently repeated and illustrated again and again. Throughout he will need more personal assistance than would be necessary for the normal child. The teacher should be at once patient and enthusiastic. The discipline should be free. The strong points of each child should be known as well as the weak, and studied as avenues of approach. The most effective stimulus will be the child's own sense of progress.
(1) See Chapter III, p. 37, and Appendix III, p. 263.
Chapter XI | Appendix I

