| | |
| www.dg.dial.pipex.com | 944 readers since 16 Dec 2007 |
Swann (1985) Notes on the text
Part I: Setting the scene
Part II: Education for all
Part III: Major areas of concern
Part IV: 'Other' ethnic minority groups
|
The Swann Report (1985)
Education for all Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Education of Children from Ethnic Minority Groups Chairman: Lord Swann Cmnd. 9453 London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office 1985
Chapter 9 Teacher education and the employment of ethnic minority teachers
This chapter The conclusions which we have reached and the policies which we have advocated in this report clearly place particular responsibilities on the teaching profession, since teachers are the key figures in the education process, and changes and developments in classroom practice and in the overall ethos of schools depend to a very great degree on the cooperation and support of individual teachers. We have already referred in previous chapters to the implications for teachers of our policies in specific areas such as language, and we have devoted considerable attention to the controversial and complex issue of teachers' attitudes towards ethnic minority pupils, and, more generally, towards the changed and changing nature of British society. In this chapter we look more broadly at the preparation and support available to teachers through their training in relation both to the needs of ethnic minority pupils and the wider issues of cultural diversity. As the Home Affairs Committee observed in their 1981 Report (1); 'Teachers cannot reasonably be blamed for failing ethnic minority children if they have not had access to the sort of initial and in-service training which would enable them to perform more successfully.'After discussing various aspects of teacher education and training, we then go on to consider the recruitment and role of teachers who are themselves of ethnic minority origin - an issue which was frequently raised in evidence to us.
I Teacher education 1. Introduction Organisation of teacher education 1.1 Teacher education falls into two broad phases - initial (or pre-service) training, and in-service training, incorporating both the induction training of newly qualified teachers or of teachers new to a school and the various forms of continuing in-service provision available to teachers throughout their careers. Initial teacher training is provided by universities, polytechnics and colleges and institutes of higher education. It comprises three or four year courses leading to the Bachelor of Education (BEd) degree, or one year courses for graduates leading to the Postgraduate Certificate in Education (PGCE). There are a limited number of courses offering concurrent teacher training leading to a BA or BSc degree and a Certificate in Education. Initial teacher training courses offered by public sector institutions (polytechnics and colleges and institutes of higher education) are currently validated by some 14 different validating bodies - over half by the Council for National Academic Awards (CNAA) and the remainder by 13 universities. In addition a number of universities offer their own degree level courses. Each teacher training institution and validating body has developed its own style of teacher training and a wide variety of models has evolved. The overall aim of initial teacher training can however be seen as to provide students with an awareness of the academic and professional basis of the education process and an introduction to teaching skills. On completion of a course of initial training a new teacher should have acquired a sound knowledge of the subject or subjects he or she will teach, and should be equipped with the professional skills and competence to begin a career in teaching with confidence. Induction training. Initial training cannot however, nor is it intended to, provide teachers with a once and forever training experience. Nor, because of its generalised nature, can it hope adequately to prepare teachers to cope with every classroom and school situation. For this reason local education authorities and schools, to varying degrees, make arrangements for newly qualified teachers to undergo what is usually referred to as 'induction training', intended to provide them with specific information about the school and the locality in which they are to teach and to offer them advice, support and possibly an opportunity for further study. Induction training of this character may well be appropriate for any teacher joining a school staff for the first time and not only for newly qualified teachers. In-service training is the umbrella term used to describe the wide variety of further training, as well as induction training, which may be available to practising teachers throughout their careers. It is, in its very nature, much more differentiated than initial training and may be provided not only by teacher training institutions but also by schools themselves and by local education authorities through their advisory staff and teachers' centres, and by subject associations, teacher unions and other bodies. It may be relatively formal and structured leading to 'named awards' or may consist simply of short courses, conferences, or workshops provided by institutions or by individual schools. In-service training is intended to be responsive to particular needs and especially to changing circumstances and situations and to promote new developments. It is generally a voluntary undertaking - teachers are not required to participate nor are schools obliged to release teachers to attend daytime courses although career advancement is increasingly dependent upon it. Thus, as is frequently emphasised, teacher education is an indivisible process which can and should continue throughout a teacher's career. Changing nature of the teaching force 1.2 The pattern of recruitment of new teachers has altered dramatically over recent years in the face of falling school rolls and constraints on public expenditure. DES figures (2) show the number of newly-qualified teachers obtaining full-time permanent appointments in maintained nursery, primary and secondary schools in England and Wales in 1982 was 9,137 (out of a total teaching force of 414,600) compared with a figure of 19,203 for 1978. Against this background of contraction, considerable emphasis in current discussions on teacher training has been placed on the in-service training available to practising teachers already working in schools. This has been seen as potentially the most effective means of directly influencing classroom practice in the short term, since the number of new entrants to the profession who have just undergone initial training is now considered too small to have any significant impact on the work of schools. Whilst we recognise the force of the argument which has led to this focus on in-service training, we believe that the role of initial training in shaping the attitudes and practices of the teaching force in the longer term must also be fully appreciated. Academic standards 1.3 We now consider the contribution which we believe each of the stages of teacher education and training can make to the fundamental reorientation of the education system as a whole to incorporate the genuinely pluralist perspective for which we have argued in this report. We must however preface all of our comments in this chapter about the role of teacher training by emphasising our firm belief in the need to preserve and where necessary enhance the academic standard of the teaching force as a whole - as the government White Paper on 'Teaching Quality' (3) put it: 'Good teachers need to have a mastery of the subject matter they teach and the professional skills needed to teach it to children of different ages, ability, aptitudes and backgrounds.'2. Initial training Overall context 2.1 Over the past decade or so the teacher training system in this country has experienced fundamental and far-reaching changes. The expansion of initial training during the 1960s has been followed by a rapid contraction of provision in response both to falling school rolls and public expenditure constraints - whereas, according to the 1983 White Paper on 'Teaching Quality', there were in the early 1970s a total of 180 initial teacher training institutions in the public sector in England and Wales, provision is currently we understand offered in some 62 public sector institutions. Alongside this major structural reorganisation, which has involved the amalgamation, diversification or closure of many institutions, there has also been the demise of the former sub-degree Certificate in Education qualification and the expansion of BEd degree and PGCE courses, often with consequent changes in validation arrangements, as a result of the government's decision to move towards an all-graduate teaching force. Against the background of these major upheavals, and in view of the confusion which exists as to the precise meaning and objectives of 'multicultural' education in schools, it is not entirely surprising that the attempts of the teacher training system over recent years to respond to the multiracial nature of society can perhaps best be seen as characterised by a confusion of aims and a lack of overall coherence. Assimilation 2.2 During the early years of large scale immigration when, as we have recalled in Chapter Four, the aim of educational policies in relation to immigrant pupils was assimilation, the response of the teacher training system focused chiefly on developing in-service courses for teachers in multiracial schools. At initial training level, work was confined almost exclusively to those teacher training institutions actually located in areas of ethnic minority settlement, some of which began to offer specialist options for interested students dealing with what were regarded as the 'problems' presented by ethnic minority pupils. The majority of institutions made no response at all to the arrival of ethnic minority pupils, presumably because, in keeping with the thinking of the time, they believed that the difficulties being experienced in multiracial schools would be relatively short-lived. Institutions in non-multiracial areas believed in any case that any broader issues arising from changes in the composition of society were irrelevant to their students. A survey undertaken by the former National Committee for Commonwealth Immigrants in 1966 (4) indicated that only 15 per cent of institutions, mostly in areas of ethnic minority settlement, were running or intending to run even optional elements in their courses in the field of 'immigrant education'. Integration 2.3 With the development of the integrationist view of ethnic minority needs, which attached greater importance to teachers understanding something of the cultural background of their pupils, albeit still as a basis for their eventual absorption into the majority community, specialist options which sought to cover the 'lifestyles' of different ethnic minority groups began to be offered, again primarily by institutions in multiracial areas, and largely through in-service training. The tendency was to focus on the cultures and religions of different countries and the 'problems' which ethnic minority pupils posed thus possibly reinforcing or even establishing negative stereotypes of ethnic minority pupils which could in fact inhibit a teacher's ability to respond positively to such pupils. Overall, developments were still very limited and in their 1972 study (5) Townsend and Brittan found that less than 1 in 5 probationary primary school teachers and only 1 in 16 probationary secondary teachers felt there had been any specific reference to the education of 'immigrant' children in their initial training, and the researchers observed that: '... there is a valid argument that not all students will become teachers in multiracial schools. There is an equally valid argument that all students in colleges of education are expected to become teachers in a multiracial Britain, but this did not seem to have been reflected in the courses of the probationer teachers in the sample.'Development of multicultural education 2.4 As doubts began to be expressed about the desirability of assimilation, some attempts began to be made in the teacher training field in the 1970s to broaden the concept of 'ethnic minority needs' to 'multicultural education'. It began to be recognised that the multiracial nature of society might be of relevance to all teachers and thus all teacher training institutions. The National Committee for Commonwealth Immigrants had been very much ahead of the general trend of thinking when it had stated in 1967 (6) that: 'No teacher training institutions can now contract out from this problem (the multiracial society and the education of immigrants) and retain an easy conscience ... All students should be given the opportunity to study this problem during their training ...'The emphasis in this statement on 'problems' and the clear reference to optional rather than compulsory provision was however characteristic of the period. The Select Committee on Race Relations and Immigration echoed this forward-looking view, and indeed took it further in their 1969 report (7) in stating that: 'We would like to see every college of education in the country teaching its students something about race relations and the problems of immigrants. To say that there is no need to educate all students about such matters because, as one college has said, "very few of our students go into schools where they are likely to meet mixed classes" is to miss the point ... Teachers should be equipped to prepare all their children for life in a multiracial society.'It is regrettable that after this positive statement of the responsibilities of the teacher training system towards the multiracial nature of society, the DES, in its 1971 report (8), returned to the restricted perception of the role of teacher training in a multiracial context as relating to only those students who were likely to teach in multiracial schools: '... the proportion of newly qualified teachers likely to meet substantial numbers of immigrant children in their first teaching posts is small, possibly as low as 15 per cent, and ... many training establishments ... are remote from areas of immigrant concentration and cannot easily arrange for their students to have contact with immigrant children during teaching practice or otherwise. Many complex demands are made on the training course and it would be impracticable to attempt to ensure that all newly qualified teachers had received a training which would equip them to take charge of classes including a substantial immigrant population immediately on entering schools.'The 1972 James Report on Teaching Training (9) however took a broader view and stated that: '... an understanding of the multicultural nature of society should feature in any general (teacher) education.'- and the Select Committee on Race Relations and Immigration reiterated their earlier line of thinking in their 1973 Report (10) and recommended explicitly that: 'All students on initial or postgraduate courses can and should be made aware that, wherever they teach, they will be doing so in a multicultural society. This should be reflected not so much in special courses but throughout the training.'CRC/ATCDE Report 2.5 1974 saw the publication of a joint report (11) prepared by the then Community Relations Commission and Association of Teachers in Colleges and Departments of Education which went into far greater detail than previous publications in considering the implications for teacher training of 'an ethnically and culturally diverse society'. This has remained one of the most important and influential documents in this field up to the present day and its findings have been constantly updated and reiterated by the successors to the original sponsoring organisations - the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) and the National Association of Teachers in Further and Higher Education (NATFHE). This report changed the terms of the debate quite markedly even in its unequivocal starting point that: 'What happens to (ethnic minorities) in our schools is crucial to the development of a racially just society. The training of teachers and other professionals should equip them to work towards such a society.'The report also stated clearly the responsibilities which it saw for all teachers, explicitly including those working in 'all-white' schools, for re-evaluating and, where appropriate, broadening the curriculum they offered. 'Wherever students eventually teach, regardless of age range or type of child, they will be involved in making curriculum choices. Therefore, all students need to be given an opportunity to consider carefully the inherent attitudes and assumptions contained in the subject matter they teach and its manner of presentation. Highly ethnocentric and implicitly biased views may be transmitted to children, both in obvious ways such as in relation to history or geography teaching about countries from which migrants have come, and also less directly but nevertheless damagingly through the attitudes communicated by other subject specialists. Such teaching can both confirm prejudiced attitudes in all-white classes and aggravate difficulties of identity and confidence for children from minority groups. On the other hand, the curriculum can provide excellent opportunities for presenting other cultures and highlighting the achievement of all human groups. It is therefore important that teachers become sensitive to this function of the curriculum.'The report concluded in terms that we ourselves would endorse: 'There is nothing new in asking teachers and teacher-trainers to re-examine their work in the light of social change. What is new, however, is the urgent challenge presented by the recent emergence of a society which contains not only the seeds of racial disharmony but also the potential for immense cultural and human enrichment. This is the situation which schools and colleges have to face. Far too many students are inadequately prepared to cope with it. Unless studies are updated to meet it they will become increasingly irrelevant and anachronistic.'Research reports 2.6 In their evidence to this Committee, NATFHE, reflecting on developments since the 1974 report, observed that: '... the original Report was more tempered and sanguine than subsequent trends have justified. Worse, the response by institutions to the Report was extremely disappointing.'It is clearly difficult to assess the response of teacher training institutions over recent years to the need to prepare all their students at initial level to incorporate a pluralist perspective in their work. Whilst there has not been any wholly reliable or comprehensive recent survey of provision in this respect, there have nevertheless been several studies which have sought to examine the current state of affairs. It may be worthwhile therefore drawing together here the finding of these various studies. - The HMI Report on 'Developments in the BEd Degree Course' (12) published in 1979, based on a study of provision in 3 polytechnics and 12 colleges, identified the educational implications of our multiracial society as: '... an important area where treatment had been superficial or non-existent.'and concluded that: 'The compulsory elements of most courses did not ... bring students towards much awareness of the special needs of certain categories of children, in particular those with a cultural background different from that of the majority.'- Also in 1979 a national survey, funded by the CRE, was undertaken to investigate 'multicultural' aspects of teacher training (13). Since the full findings of this survey have not as yet been made publicly available we reproduce as Annex A to this chapter a paper describing the main findings. In broad terms this study found that roughly half of the colleges, two thirds of the polytechnics and one third of the universities involved claimed to be making at least some provision to help students to teach in a multicultural context. Not all this provision was on a compulsory basis and some courses were concerned primarily with the 'special needs' of ethnic minority pupils. - During 1979/1980 HMI undertook an inspection exercise of the coverage of multicultural issues at initial and in-service level in a sample of 46 out of the (then) 69 public sector teacher training institutions in England. Again, because the findings of this study do not appear to be widely known, we reproduce a paper summarising the findings as Annex B to this chapter. The overall picture revealed by this study in relation to initial training was, in the words of HMI: '... not a particularly bright one.'21 of the institutions expressed the view that the issues of a pluralist society were not immediately relevant to them, and although 30 of the institutions were found to take 'some account' of this aspect of education within the basic compulsory programme of professional training, this contrasted strikingly with the PGCE courses, only three of which had an explicit compulsory element on 'multicultural education' and only a further five of which had incorporated a reference to ethnic minority groups in school and society within basic educational or professional studies. HMI expressed the view that: 'The fact that a third of all the institutions train BEd students who, like the great majority of PGCE students, need take no account, during their preparation for teaching, of education in a multicultural society must be a matter for concern.'- In preparing their evidence for the Home Affairs Committee for its 1981 Report on Racial Disadvantage, the National Union of Teachers (NUT) undertook a survey of all teacher training institutions and in their consequent memorandum (14) reported that: 'Only 15 replies out of 67 indicated that all students in training would receive some lectures or other form of input to their course which would give them information relevant to teaching in a multicultural society, and even fewer replies mentioned a compulsory element. It is therefore still possible for many teachers to emerge from their training without having covered the subject at all, though a wide range of optional courses and lectures are provided in various College and University departments.'- The 1982 HMI Report on 'The New Teacher in School' (15) also offered some relevant information in analysing the views of newly trained teachers in a sample of 294 primary and secondary schools in England and Wales about aspects of their initial training. As the following table, taken from the HMI Report, shows, fewer than half of the teachers in the sample considered themselves adequately prepared for teaching children with different cultural backgrounds: (expressed in percentage of teachers)
*In the questionnaires the teachers were asked to rate their views on a scale of 1-5: 1 if the statements in the left-hand column reflected their view and 5 if the statements in the right-hand column reflected their view, with the other markings to reflect views between these two extremes. - A more recent government survey (16) has reported that in 1981/1982 some 72 per cent of initial teacher training establishments in the UK included tuition about the particular needs of ethnic minority children in their courses. A further 5 per cent were considering introducing such provision. The survey undertaken in 1983 for this Committee by Professor Craft and Dr Atkins on the provision for training teachers of ethnic minority community languages, (see Annex F to Chapter Seven) while reporting a dismal picture in that respect, also found that a large majority of institutions now include work on language repertoire and English language support across the curriculum in their courses. 2.7 Thus, looking at the situation overall, as Dr Richard Willey has put it in a draft report on teacher training (17): 'Such limited evidence as is available suggests that many schools and teacher education institutions are responding only slowly to the DES's stated pluralist, multicultural aims; there appears to be growing inconsistency between DES rhetoric and the content of much teacher education.'It must be acknowledged that certain teacher training institutions and some other bodies concerned with teacher training, such as the Council for National Academic Awards, have, in recent years, devoted considerable efforts to reappraising their work in the light of the changing nature of British society. But even taking these efforts into account, work in this area is still characterised by a lack of clarity and coherence as to essential aims and objectives. Dual themes 2.8 What is perhaps most immediately apparent from this consideration of the various recent studies of the 'multicultural' aspects of teacher education, apart from the general paucity of provision, is the continuing confusion of two distinct forms of provision - on the one hand, course provision designed specifically to give student teachers the particular knowledge and skills needed to teach in a multiracial school, and, on the other hand, the preparation of all students in initial training for teaching pupils in a multiracial society, irrespective of whether the students concerned will be teaching in an 'all-white' or multiracial school. The confusion of these distinct perceptions of multicultural education, as relating either to the immediate multiracial situation in a particular school or to the broader multiracial social context, has of course contributed to much of the misunderstanding and lack of progress in this field up to now. As we have already emphasised, we regard a concern for both these complementary elements as equally crucial to our philosophy of 'Education for All'. Just as we believe however that rather different approaches to the curriculum will be called for in different schools, so within teacher training, distinct approaches will also be needed to cater for different sets of circumstances. There are nevertheless a number of broad principles which we feel must underlie the development of an appropriate teacher training response to the needs of today's society. The task for teacher education 2.9 We have already made clear that we see all schools having a responsibility to offer their pupils an education which reflects the realities of life in today's multiracial Britain. We regard 'Education for All' as essentially synonymous with a 'good' education, since an education which is not based on sound educational principles and which fails to take account of the variety of cultural, religious and linguistic backgrounds which now make up British society, and, more broadly, which fails to incorporate a global perspective, would be anachronistic and would prepare pupils, both those from the various minority and the majority communities, for an unreal world. Similarly a curriculum which does not acknowledge and seek to challenge manifestations of racism at both individual and institutional level, through enhancing pupils' political literacy and particularly their appreciation of how power is exercised, and by whom, in this society, would, in our view constitute a fundamental mis-education and would certainly fail to lay the foundations for the kind of genuinely pluralist society which we envisaged at the opening of this report. If a genuine pluralist approach to education is thus justified as desirable and indeed essential on educational grounds, then it is clear that in order to be equipped, in professional terms, to offer their pupils a full and balanced education all teachers must be given the appropriate knowledge and skills for providing such an education. As Dr Richard Willey has again put it in his draft report: '... it is the teachers and teacher educators working in the different curriculum areas who must undertake the type of review which follows from the assumption of a multicultural objective, and who face the complex decisions about detailed objectives and priorities. Teacher trainers in particular have a key role to play; in the forum provided by the courses which they already teach, they can stimulate and lead consideration of the implications of cultural pluralism for existing teaching strategies and content ... The objective of a multicultural society is in the process of closer definition ... Teachers have a central part to play in this process and they must be given the opportunities to play it. If they are not, not only will minority ethnic and cultural groups become increasingly disillusioned with an education system which is failing to respond adequately to their presence, but there will be a widening gap between society's theoretical aspirations and the reality of what is happening in schools.'2.10 The 1983 HMI discussion paper on Initial Training (18) stressed that the initial training of all student teachers should give them an awareness and understanding of the broader context of their work and the responsibility of schools in catering for the aspirations and expectations of society at large: 'No teacher should lack understanding of the purposes of the curriculum and its relationship to the wider society; nor should a teacher lack understanding of the ways in which society and schools are inter-related, ways in which the background of pupils' lives influence what they bring to their learning, and the expectations which they, their families and their teachers have of education. The student's course of training should enable him to place his work within this broader framework of educational meaning and purpose.'We endorse this view of the wider responsibilities of the individual teacher, beyond the immediate concerns of his or her school and subject specialism. All student teachers have a responsibility to understand and appreciate the multiracial social context in which they will be teaching and to prepare their pupils for life in a pluralist society. As the Head of one secondary school put it in a discussion paper prepared for our Conference in November 1981: 'We (teachers) accept the responsibility of fulfilling society's demands on us, without accepting responsibility for the nature of those demands. We have to accept that society is the product of the education system and we are the custodians of the future. What we are doing in schools today will be reflected in the society of tomorrow. We cannot wait for the world outside school to change, the change begins with us. Tomorrow's multicultural Britain is the pupils we have in school now. The future will be what our pupils make it, and we give them the tools.'The following draft policy statement, which was submitted to us in evidence from one teacher training institution, sets out how one institution envisaged the task for initial teacher training in relation to all student teachers and we reproduce it here as a guide to the issues involved: a. It is a teacher's responsibility to know and understand the children he teaches to the best of his ability - in particular to know and understand those social and cultural elements of an individual child's upbringing and experience which contribute to the formation of his distinctive personality, and to accept and to value these distinctive characteristics, so that his understanding of them informs the content and method of his teaching of each child. b. It is also a teacher's responsibility to develop his understanding throughout his career, of the complex and changing nature of society, and of the knowledge, attitudes and skills needed by children growing up in such a society - so that his understanding of these informs the content and methods of his teaching of all children. 'a.' implies a special responsibility for any teacher who is teaching a child of ethnic minority background (such children are by no means peculiar to the obviously 'multiracial' schools in inner urban areas); 'b.' implies a responsibility for all teachers of all children to prepare those children for life in a multiracial society. Thus these statements entail a common set of objectives for the initial vocational education of all teachers. a. Affective On completion of their initial vocational education, all student teachers should accept and understand the practical implications for teachers of: 1. the uniqueness of each human beingWhile there are extreme difficulties in translating objectives in the affective domain into operational policies, and possible resistance to the idea of influencing systematically students' (or children's) 'attitudes', it seems undeniable that the attitudes of students towards the children they teach and towards individuals and groups different from themselves are substantially modified for better or worse in the process of teacher education, that this objective does imply (or rule out) specific teaching policies and practices, and that a student who leaves college without understanding and accepting these propositions lacks some of the professional qualities required to implement the responsibilities of a teacher (cf. 1 above): i.e. s/he is not wholly and adequately qualified to be a teacher. b. Cognitive/propositional On completion of their initial teacher education, all student teachers should know, and understand the practical implications for teachers of: 1. the meaning in scientific usage of the terms 'race', 'culture' and 'community'.c. Cognitive/procedural On completion of their initial teacher education all student teachers should be able to: 1a. recognise, and constantly reassess his/her own attitudes, beliefs and understanding.2. select sources of learning experience for children which: 2a. will be intelligible to each child in terms of his own experience and upbringing.3. detect in any materials available for children to see, hear or read: 3a. factual inaccuracy, especially in the presentation of information about racial and cultural differences.4. plan and organise his/her teaching so that each child: 4a. is helped to overcome specific learning difficulties, in particular, difficulties in the use of English.Different forms of provision 2.11 The response of the initial teacher training system to 'multicultural' concerns has tended to take three main forms - compulsory 'core' studies, specialist optional courses, and, more recently, attempts to develop an implicit 'multicultural awareness' in all aspects of a course, through what has come to be termed 'permeation'. We believe that each of these approaches has an essential role to play in preparing all students, whether entering teaching through the BEd or the PGCE route, to fulfil their professional responsibilities in today's society and they should be regarded as inter-related and complementary aspects of an overall training process. Permeation 2.12 The concept of permeation was heralded as long ago as 1974 when the CRC/ATCDE Report argued that the training of students to teach in a multicultural context: '... cannot be mechanistic, involving merely adding a little here or taking away a little there, whilst leaving the main body of the student's educational experience untouched.'- but that the training which all students receive at initial level must reflect the multiracial nature of today's society. We wholeheartedly endorse this view as in keeping with 'Education for All'. Just as within the school curriculum we have argued that far more than separate, 'added on' provision is called for, so in teacher training we are concerned that reliance on specific courses, whether optional or compulsory, can lend support to the view that the implications of a multiracial society are peripheral to the mainstream concerns of education. Any course of study is informed and permeated by various assumptions, conscious or unconscious, which condition the selection of subject matter, the approach adopted to it and the emphasis laid upon various parts of it. Existing initial training courses thus already convey to students certain implied values and value judgements. The permeation of an initial training course with the principles underlying a genuinely pluralist approach to education should seek to ensure that all aspects of the course develop an awareness of the multiracial and culturally diverse nature of British society and of the world as it is today, and of the wide range of information and ideas now required in order to comprehend contemporary issues. It is also important that all existing courses should recognise the diverse cultural context of which the sociology, psychology and philosophy of education should take account. Negative stereotypes of ethnic minority communities should be discussed and challenged and the responsibility of the education system to cater for the needs of all pupils and to educate all pupils for life in a pluralist society should be recognised. Subject-specific studies may also be permeated with a pluralist perspective for example by discussing the development of scientific and mathematical concepts in different cultures, by broadening the range of literature, music and art drawn upon in subject studies and by moving away from an exclusively Anglo or Euro-centric perception of history and geography. This process will involve not only reviewing the content of courses but also possibly discarding or adapting teaching materials or coursebooks where these present an unreal picture of the world as it is today. Historical understanding, not only in relation to history courses but more generally as the overall perspective through which all study material is seen, may need to be broadened, and the aims of education for the society of the future, and the student's potential role within this, should be analysed and discussed. As the Home Affairs Committee put it in their 1981 Report: 'it is plainly desirable that all teaching should be as broad-minded as possible and so should reflect the diversity of modern Britain, and we recognise the advantage that would accrue to racial harmony were all children made to realise that Britain is a multiracial society. Teacher training courses should be permeated by this understanding ... We recommend that every initial teacher training course should be examined to ensure that it accurately reflects the society in which those who follow the course will be working.'2.13 At the broadest level, a 'satisfactorily permeated' course would in our view be one in which:
'If there is a contradiction between the theory advanced in a separate course (on multicultural education) and students' experience in most of their other studies, there may be misunderstanding of the need to include multicultural education as a compulsory part of training and a negative reaction or even resentment from some students ... There is a danger that ... the theories expounded in specialist multicultural courses, both optional and compulsory, bear little relation to the education provided by the institution's major teaching departments ... If the principle of permeation is accepted, it follows that all the subject areas and disciplines contributing to teacher education will need to consider the particular relevance to their own specialisms of a positive attitude to cultural diversity.'2.14 It is important to recognise however that permeation alone cannot be regarded as providing adequate preparation for the kind of teaching which we have advocated and especially for teaching in a multiracial school, without additional specialist course work, both compulsory and optional. As the NUT put it in their evidence to the Home Affairs Committee: 'Whilst the Union wholly supports the concept of "permeation", and considers that education for a multicultural society should be an integral part of all training courses, there is a danger that it may be possible to pay lip service to ideals which have become fashionable or to respond to growing concern and criticism without much tangible evidence that the ideals are put into practice. This strategy of "permeation" may be effective where the level of awareness and commitment amongst course tutors is high, but without specific, detailed plans for compulsory input to initial courses, backed up by specialist options for those who wish to pursue the issues in more depth and widen their expertise, it may be just a paper promise.'2.15 It will be clear that, in its very nature, it is difficult to seek to present 'examples' of a 'permeated course' and indeed our impression from the evidence which we received was that little real progress has as yet been made in any but a few institutions to put into practice the rhetoric devoted publicly to the concept of permeation. Nevertheless we draw together in Annex C to this chapter examples of the approach adopted to their work by some teacher training institutions which reflect the underlying principles of permeation. Core studies 2.16 If our view of 'Education for All' as relevant to every school in the country, whether multiracial or 'all-white', is accepted, it is clear that every student teacher must have at least some opportunity in the course of their training to consider the issues involved. If all initial training courses were already permeated with the broad principles discussed above this would of course ensure that this was so, but it is clear that even if the policies which we have advocated are adopted immediately, it will still be some time before all initial training courses are fully and effectively permeated by a pluralist perspective. We therefore believe there is a strong case in the immediate future for some reference to be made to pluralist issues within the central and compulsory 'core' of the initial training received by all teachers, as an essential 'staging post' and catalyst to overall permeation. Such a core element can also be seen as justified on the grounds of enabling teachers to fulfil their responsibilities in relation to the reality of British society and indeed the modern world today. As the 1982 HMI discussion document on initial training put it (our underlining): 'An effective course of training should include for all students practical experience and knowledge of class management and control: knowledge of the variety that constitutes the full range of pupils in terms of ability, behaviour, social background and culture: experience and knowledge of the level of expectation appropriate to the performance of children of differing ages, abilities, aptitudes and backgrounds: awareness of the ethical, spiritual and aesthetic values of society as well as its political, economic and legal foundations: respect for and understanding of the cultural heritage which belongs to the children growing up in our society: sensitivity to the diversity of cultural background in today's school population. This list, while not comprehensive, includes those aspects of the teacher's skill which relate to our multicultural society, the recognition of children with special needs in the ordinary classroom and the preparation of pupils for their working and adult lives. While some students may wish to pursue further specialist options in these concerns, they should be part of the basic professional preparation of all teachers in relation to the subjects they will teach to the children of any "normal" classroom.'2.17 We would not wish to prescribe a 'model' core course as appropriate for all institutions and all courses. The main areas which we believe should be covered will be evident from the general comments which we have already offered - at the broadest level all students should be given an informed awareness of the diversity, on many levels, of today's multiracial society. This would include basic 'facts and figures' about the process of immigration to and emigration from this country over the last 150 years; the circumstances which have conditioned the experiences and aspirations of different ethnic minority groups; and also the theory and practice of racism at both institutional and individual level, how this operates, and can be challenged, both in society at large and in the education world. Above all it should be emphasised that the opportunities for broadening and enriching every child's education offered by our multiracial society are equally relevant should a teacher find him or herself teaching in a rural, 'all-white' school or an urban, multiracial school - all schools and all teachers have a professional responsibility to prepare their pupils for life in a pluralist society and in the wider world which has changed so dramatically over the last 30 years. The changing perceptions of 'ethnic minority education' from the early days of assimilationist thinking should also be considered by students and the straightforward educational grounds for broadening the curriculum should be discussed alongside questions of justice, equality and the aims of a genuinely pluralist society. Needs of ethnic minority pupils 2.18 We regard an equally important aspect of 'Education for All' as meeting the needs of all children in a positive manner, which would include catering for any particular educational needs which some ethnic minority pupils may have as a result of their cultural or linguistic background. It has been argued that, since such needs can, by definition, arise only in a multiracial school, the preparation of teachers to cater for them can only be achieved through in-service provision if a teacher joins a multiracial school or through specialist options at initial training level in those institutions whose students are likely to be teaching in multiracial areas. This argument overlooks two important points - firstly, the increasing mobility of the ethnic minority communities which prevents such a rigid dividing line being drawn between multiracial and 'all-white' areas, and secondly, the present teacher employment situation, where it is increasingly difficult for new teachers to choose their first teaching post and to 'predict' therefore that any teacher will never teach in a multiracial school. Multi-racial schools can no longer be regarded as unique to urban areas such as Manchester or Bradford since schools in many other parts of the country now have pupils of ethnic minority origin. On the question of teacher employment, as the Home Affairs Committee observed in their 1981 Report: 'Most young teachers will find themselves teaching in a multiracial school either on starting their teaching career or within 5 years of their induction. Nor are those who train in the West Country or East Anglia any less likely to be teaching in the West Midlands or ILEA than those who trained at Walsall of Goldsmiths. In a mobile and contracting profession, there is every reason why teachers trained at Exeter, for example, may obtain their first teaching post in Leicester, and find themselves unprepared for the experience of teaching Asian children.'We believe that all teachers should receive, as part of the compulsory core of their initial training, an introduction to the particular educational needs which may arise in a multiracial school. This view was shared by the Home Affairs Committee who concluded that: '... initial teacher training should not skimp on providing more specialised instruction on the skills needed for teaching English as a second language (E2L); for offering second-stage support for E2L learners, for recognising and coping with other language differences, and for understanding social patterns which may be different from accepted norms ... it is evident that such instruction is too often regarded as ... suitable for only those teachers who are likely to be seeking posts in multiracial areas. Nothing could be more misleading.'We are not suggesting here that such core studies could in any sense fully prepare a student to teach effectively in a multiracial school with no further specialised induction or in-service training. What we are advocating however is that every student teacher should become familiar with the major issues which arise in relation to the education of ethnic minority pupils and the policies adopted to cater for them, so that if he or she subsequently teaches in a multiracial school they will be able to respond positively and sensitively to the needs of the pupils and have a 'base' of general knowledge on which to build through more specialised in-service training. Care must be taken however in providing such basic understanding not to establish or confirm negative stereotypes of ethnic minority pupils, but rather to convey a positive view of any particular needs which they may have as simply one dimension of their individual education needs and which can often, for example in the language field, be seen as an extension of the needs which any child may have and for which it is entirely reasonable to expect the school to cater. Not only would such an introduction provide teachers with the basic information needed should they find themselves working with ethnic minority pupils, but it would also enable them to make an informed choice as to whether they wished to take up a specialist option course, for example to study language needs in greater depth, within their initial training. 2.19 As an illustration of the various ways in which the areas of work discussed above have been incorporated into the core studies of their BEd courses by various institutions, we attach as Annex D to this chapter two examples of course outlines, taken from the evidence which we have received. Whilst many educationists would accept that the inclusion of the kind of core courses we have advocated is feasible within a 3 or 4 year BEd course, it has been suggested that the time constraints of a PGCE course, even when extended to 36 weeks, are such as to preclude anything other than a very superficial consideration of 'multicultural' issues. The view has therefore been expressed that it is preferable to look to either specialist options at initial level or in-service provision for PGCE-trained entrants. We believe however that the kind of core provision which we have discussed above is equally valid and essential for the overall reorientation of all initial training courses in the immediate future, whether through the BEd or PGCE route. It is important to recognise that the current trend is for an increasing proportion of new teachers to enter the profession through the PGCE route and this adds urgency to the need to incorporate a pluralist perspective within the core studies of such courses. It is likely that few degree courses will have given consideration to issues related to today's multiracial society and specific questions relating to the role of education in this context will rarely if ever have been raised. The risk that PGCE students will regard specialist optional courses in this field as irrelevant and superfluous is perhaps therefore even greater than for other students, unless a general introduction to the issues involved is provided for all students in their core studies. Whilst we recognise that time for the core of a PGCE course is limited, we believe that given appropriate skill and sensitivity it should be possible to avoid creating or confirming stereotypes of ethnic minority groups or focusing only on 'problems' and 'difficulties', and instead to discuss issues such as the influence of racism and the need for a broader approach to the curriculum for all pupils which may lead some students to pursue such questions further through optional studies. Whilst again we would not seek to put forward a 'model' PGCE core course, and we have indeed had some difficulty in finding examples which fully reflect our viewpoint, we include in Annex D details of the approach adopted by one university department of education which, whilst we would not endorse it wholeheartedly, gives some indication of the range and kind of considerations we have in mind. Optional courses 2.20 Much of the provision at initial level in relation to multicultural education has been in the form of optional courses, concerned either with specific topics, such as the language needs of ethnic minority pupils, or more general themes such as race relations. If such issues feature however as simply one or two options in competition with a number of others, students may well feel their career interests are better served by choosing other optional courses - as the HMI survey described in Annex B observed: 'The usefulness of a course on slow learners, audio-visual aids or some such topic may well override a student's interest in multicultural issues, as the anxieties of teaching practice draw near. Faced with some sets of options students may feel they have very little choice.'Optional courses relating to the educational implications of cultural diversity are also likely to attract primarily those students who already have an interest in and some commitment to pluralist principles - in effect 'preaching to the converted'. They would be less likely to appeal to those students who have little interest or knowledge of 'multicultural' issues or who mistakenly see themselves as teaching only in 'all-white' schools, which as we stressed in paragraph 2.18, may in fact be far from certain. Above all, however, if these issues are dealt with solely through optional courses, the teacher training system is in effect lending support to the 'traditional' view that such matters are not sufficiently important or relevant to mainstream education to warrant a central place in the professional training of all teachers and can simply be relegated to peripheral courses for those students who might wish to specialise in these 'problems'. Since we believe that such issues are in fact relevant to all pupils, all schools and all teachers, we believe it is entirely inadequate for any teacher training institution to limit its preparation of teachers for a pluralist context to optional courses. It has been suggested that optional provision is in some respects likely to be more effective than compulsory provision since a conscious decision to study a particular issue contributes to a higher degree of motivation and commitment than where students are required to cover an area of work. Such an argument assumes however that all students have a basic appreciation and understanding of the importance of cultural diversity for their future role as teachers and can make informed option choices - in other words that 'multicultural' issues have been covered specifically through compulsory core studies and more generally elsewhere in the course. As we have seen from the various studies detailed in paragraph 2.6 above however, optional courses seem often, regrettably, to be an institution's only response to such issues and have often been established instead of, rather than alongside, core studies and permeation. In such a situation it is difficult to accept that optional courses alone can effectively support the development of any but the most highly committed and enlightened student. 2.21 This is not to suggest that there is no place for specialist optional courses in initial training. On the contrary, providing such optional courses develop from and build upon a basic understanding of teaching in a culturally pluralist society, received through a student's core studies and ultimately from a fully permeated course, they will continue to play an important role in catering for the particular needs and interests of certain students. The form which such optional courses may take can clearly vary widely from those relating explicitly to the particular linguistic needs which some ethnic minority pupils may have, to those concerned more broadly with the opportunities available to any teacher teaching in a multiracial school to broaden and enhance their teaching and the need for all teachers to reflect a pluralist perspective in their work. We attach at Annex E some examples of optional provision offered within BEd courses, drawn from the evidence we have received. Such options are however, by no means limited to BEd courses and we received a number of examples of similar options offered within PGCE courses. We attach as Annex F to this chapter a paper prepared by the tutor of such an optional PGCE course on multicultural education, discussing the range of issues covered and raising some interesting points about the reactions of students. Practical experience 2.22 Up to now we have focused primarily on the 'taught' elements of initial training courses. However if students, especially those from 'all-white' areas, are to be given a genuine awareness of the complexity of British society, it is clear that such course provision should be complemented by appropriate practical experience. As the evidence we received from one teacher training institution put it: '... a genuine synthesis of educational theory, practice and experience needs to be developed in programmes of initial training, and ... the perspectives of multiracial education offer a genuine and practicable opportunity for such development to be realised. We would therefore urge that as many students as is possible should have experience of working in schools of cultural and racial diversity during their period of training in order that this experience might both inform and benefit from college or institute based programmes.'We hope that efforts will be made by all teacher training institutions to ensure that all their students, whether on BEd or PGCE courses, have an opportunity of gaining some practical experience in a multiracial school. It might be assumed that this was already customary in those institutions in multiracial areas, however, the HMI Survey summarised in Annex B found that: 'Whilst one would expect a student's experience of multi-ethnic schools ... to be related to the proximity of training institutions to areas of settlement by immigrant communities, this was by no means universal. One third of the institutions offering courses on education in a multicultural society did not bring students into sustained contact with multi-ethnic schools or communities, even though some were in areas of substantial ethnic minority populations.'Nevertheless there are we understand a number of institutions which have developed close relationships with multiracial schools in their areas and which have sought to involve their students with the activities of ethnic minority communities 'beyond the school gates' - an approach which we would certainly endorse. It could be suggested that constraints of time and finance may make it difficult for institutions located in 'all-white' areas to offer their students experience in multiracial schools. In our interim report we mentioned as 'good practice' the establishment by one teacher training institution situated in a rural area of a residential 'urban studies centre' designed to give its students direct experience of a multiracial environment. Whilst we commend such initiatives, we should emphasise that the main focus should always be on the shared experiences of ethnic majority and ethnic minority communities within our society and on the positive opportunities offered by multiracial schools, rather than on the 'strangeness' or on the 'problems' of such schools, which would in our view confirm or establish negative stereotypes rather than create greater awareness and understanding. Even if institutions in 'all-white' areas are not able to organise such structured 'multiracial experience' for their students, efforts should still be made to arrange temporary attachments of students to institutions in multiracial areas or indeed for the 'exchange' of students on a regular basis, since it must be recognised that, just as students from 'all-white' areas need some experience of multiracial areas in order to see their work in a truly pluralist context, so students from multiracial areas would also, in our view, benefit from experience of work in 'all-white' schools, as part of broadening their cultural horizons. Our view 2.23 Thus, to sum up, we would regard core studies, optional courses and permeation as having equally important and complementary roles to play in an overall initial training process which provides students with the essential knowledge and professional skills needed to teach in a pluralist society and to offer their pupils an education which is relevant to the world as it is today. We would envisage permeation setting the appropriate context for all students' work, core studies providing all students with an introduction to the broad issues relevant to a pluralist society as well as developing a basic understanding of the nature of and response to the particular educational needs which may arise in a multiracial school, and specialist optional courses offering the opportunity for further in-depth study. It is clear that it is the process of permeation that has the most wide-ranging implications for institutions and it is therefore here that we believe the greatest efforts should be directed, through institutions reviewing and evaluating their course provision to incorporate a pluralist perspective throughout. We would endorse the view taken by Dr Richard Willey in his draft report that: 'If the permeation of teacher education programmes is to be made a reality, the teacher education institutions must formally consider the implications of cultural pluralism for the professional training they provide and adopt appropriate policy objectives ... It is only determined initiation of such a process which can eventually produce effective teacher education for a culturally plural society.'The ways in which an individual teacher training institution can meet these requirements will clearly vary according to particular circumstances and expertise. Some institutions may already have considerable resources, others may have few or none and will need to rely heavily upon outside input. Those institutions offering self-contained BEd courses will have excellent opportunities for ensuring that every aspect of provision is 'permeated'. In others, where initial teacher training is linked with a BA or BSc degree, difficulties may be experienced as many elements are likely to fall outside the jurisdiction of the teacher trainers, being taken in common with other first degree students. Similar circumstances might be experienced with PGCE courses where the students' first degree studies have frequently been undertaken in another institution entirely. It can be seen therefore that the concept of permeation has implications for the whole of Higher Education provision in this country and we hope that all Higher Education institutions, not just those involved directly in teacher education, will be prepared to incorporate a pluralist perspective in all their provision. We recognise that the reorientation of initial teacher training which we have advocated here will not come about overnight and that it will call for debate and discussion about the specific implications of these broad policy objectives for individual institutions. We hope however that this report will serve as a stimulus and a catalyst to progress. Role of CATE 2.24 One major current initiative in the field of teacher training which we feel could accelerate the pace of progress towards the incorporation of a pluralist perspective in all initial training courses is the establishment of a Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education (CATE) to advise the Secretaries of State on the approval of initial teacher training courses in England and Wales (19). The new Council has been asked to review all existing approved courses of initial training and to scrutinise proposals for new courses in the light of specified criteria designed to ensure a consistent standard of training commensurate with the professional qualities required of a teacher. Since we have argued here that, in order to be professionally equipped to fulfil his or her teaching responsibilities, a teacher must have acquired both the knowledge and skills needed to prepare all pupils for life in a pluralist society, and must also have a basic understanding of the particular educational needs which some ethnic minority pupils may have, we believe it is essential that these considerations are taken into account by the Council in its assessment of course provision. We are encouraged therefore that the criteria laid down by the government include the following reference to the implications of cultural diversity and to the need to guard against the possible influence of racism: 'Students should be prepared ... to teach the full range of pupils whom they are likely to encounter in an ordinary school, with their diversity of ability, behaviour, social background and ethnic and cultural origins. They will need to learn how to respond flexibly to such diversity and to guard against preconceptions based on the race or sex of pupils.'We were concerned to find however that the draft criteria originally issued by the government as a basis for consultation made no explicit reference to the need for all teachers to incorporate a pluralist perspective in their work. Our Chairman therefore wrote to the Secretary of State in February last year suggesting that some reference should be incorporated in the criteria to the need for initial teacher training courses to equip students with an understanding of the multiracial and culturally diverse nature of British society today in which all their pupils will be living and of how their teaching can help to lay the foundations for a racially just and genuinely pluralist society. We were pleased to find that the final agreed version of the criteria issued by the government in April took some account of our observations and now include the following reference to these broader concerns: 'Students should be made aware of the wide range of relationships with parents and others - which teachers can expect to develop in a diverse society, and of the role of the school within a community ... They will also need to have a basic understanding of the type of society in which their pupils are growing up, with its cultural and racial mix ...'We urge the Secretary of State to go further and ask the new Council to pay particular attention to the aims and objectives which we have set out for initial teacher training in this report in undertaking its review of provision. To this end, we consider it important that in their enquiries into initial training courses, HMI should pay specific attention to the provision of training for all students that will prepare them for teaching in a pluralist society and comment on this provision to CATE. Selection of students and qualified teacher status 2.25 One of the main messages of the government's recent pronouncements on teacher training has been a desire for a more stringent selection process of candidates for admission to teacher training, coupled with a wish to ensure that qualified teacher status should not be awarded to any student who, although he or she demonstrates the necessary academic ability, lacks the 'professional competence' required of a teacher. Throughout this report we have highlighted the need for all teachers to have positive attitudes towards teaching in a pluralist context and, by extension, this means that we would wish to see such attitudes manifested and developed amongst student teachers. As long ago as 1971, the DES Education Survey 13 stressed that: 'A student should honestly examine the premise that a multicultural society in twentieth century Britain is both right and natural. If his attitude to a racially mixed class is wrong, no amount of knowledge, no mastery of techniques will make him effective as a teacher of immigrant children.'We would echo this view and indeed go further: if a teacher has negative attitudes towards ethnic minorities and the development of a culturally plural society then he or she will in our view remain an inadequate teacher of any child in any school in this country. Thus, as observed by HMI in their discussion paper on the content of Initial Training: 'Selection of the right students is the first step in providing the right kind of teachers.'The criteria used by institutions in selecting students for admission to courses of initial training are therefore extremely important. The DES Circular on the approval of initial teacher training courses reflected the stance taken by the White Paper 'Teaching Quality' in respect of the qualities considered suitable for prospective teacher training students in stating that: 'In assessing the personal qualities of candidates, institutions should look in particular for a sense of responsibility, a robust but balanced outlook, awareness, sensitivity, enthusiasm and facility in communication.'We believe an important element in a 'balanced and aware outlook' is a positive attitude towards the diversity of British society today. The White Paper on 'Teaching Quality' acknowledged that there will inevitably be some students who, although academically able, are temperamentally and professionally unsuited to a career in teaching. We believe that if a student demonstrates by his actions or behaviour during taught studies or teaching practice, deep-seated and openly racist views about ethnic minority groups which materially affect the way he teaches and which do not appear to be open to reason or change through training, that should be an important element in assessing whether he or she is temperamentally suitable to enter the teaching profession. Potential teachers with such views are unlikely to be able to fulfil the professional responsibilities of a teacher in preparing pupils to live harmoniously in today's pluralist society. Validation 2.26 It is clear that if the developments advocated here are to take place, a leading role must be played by the various validating bodies to exert their influence to encourage all initial training institutions to reappraise and revise their provision. With the ending of college validation by a number of universities a considerable responsibility in this respect falls on the Council for National Academic Awards (CNAA), and we have therefore been encouraged by the initiatives taken since the establishment of the CNAA Working Group on Multicultural Education. In particular we were impressed by the positive stance adopted by the Working Group in a discussion paper, produced in July 1984, with the following emphasis on the skills needed by student teachers to fulfil their role in a pluralist society: 'Given the wider role that teachers in schools and in further education have to play in (the) recognition of the importance of multicultural and antiracist education, there is a need to consider the implications for their education and professional preparation. In designing courses of teacher education, institutions should bear in mind the following. Teachers need to:We produce the Working Group's paper in full as Annex G to this chapter as an indication of the specific policies advocated to achieve these broad objectives. We hope that the CNAA will continue with its work in this field and that other validating bodies will follow this lead in expressing publicly their support for developing a pluralist perspective throughout teacher education. We also hope that those universities which offer their own degree level courses will seek to ensure that these underlying principles are fully reflected in their teacher education provision. 3. In-service training 3.1 We now turn to the varied forms of further training which are offered to teachers in the course of their teaching careers - what can collectively be termed 'in-service' provision. This can broadly be divided into, on the one hand, the training offered to newly qualified teachers on taking up a teaching post, or to teachers who are new to a school, and, on the other hand, the bewildering variety of other forms of further training which may be available to any teacher in the course of his or her career. We consider each of these types of in-service training in turn. Induction training Background 3.2 Specific programmes aimed at introducing newly qualified staff to an organisation, preparing them for their specific responsibilities and offering them general advice and practical help and support are a feature of most professions. On the face of it the teaching profession is no different from any other in this respect. It has long been accepted that newly qualified teachers in their probationary year can benefit from a programme of professional initiation and support - usually termed 'induction training'. The James Report emphasised the vital importance of the induction year and this was endorsed by the then government in their 1972 (20) White Paper: 'There is no major profession to which a new entrant, however thorough his initial training, can be expected immediately to make a full contribution. The government share the view of the James Committee that a teacher on first employment needs, and should be released part-time to profit from, a systematic programme of professional initiation, guided experience and further study.'With the expansion of initial teacher training in the late 1960s and early 1970s some LEAs began to develop provision in the induction field. However few if any LEAs ever reached the level of induction support recommended by the James Report and overall developments in this field were disappointing. With the contraction of provision for initial teacher training in recent years, and the correspondingly smaller number of newly qualified teachers entering schools, even this rather limited development of induction training has generally been curtailed. 3.3 A survey undertaken by the DES in 1979 (21) found that: 'In maintained nursery, primary, secondary and special education about 90 per cent of teachers taking up first full-time permanent appointments in 1978-1979 were involved in some sort of induction programme.'Current situation A survey undertaken by HMI in 1981 detailed in the Report 'The New Teacher in School' considered in detail the provision made by schools and LEAs for induction training for probationary teachers in a sample of 294 schools, both primary and secondary. In relation to the school's role in induction, HMI found that: 'In most cases schools had thought out their role vis-à-vis new teachers in the light of their level of expectation, and this had led to a range of policies from non-intervention to over-protectiveness. Between the two extremes there was evidence in very many schools of a sincere and honest endeavour to incorporate new teachers into the staff team and to help them in their professional development ... There was wide recognition of the importance, for this, of the "right, happy atmosphere in which to work", and a general background of support and encouragement from the staff as a whole. In some schools, both primary and secondary, this was envisaged as a wholly informal and unplanned state of affairs. In others, induction was considered a more purposeful process requiring some level of structure, sometimes a designated member of staff with responsibility for the new teachers, and a clear objective such as "the continuation of the probationer's professional training" or "building on the work of the initial training institution".'The survey found a variety of forms of induction training and support offered to the newly qualified teachers in their schools - only half of the secondary schools and a quarter of the primary schools offered a structured induction programme. The following table, taken from the report of the survey shows the full range of provision made:
In relation to the LEAs role in induction, HMI found that in over half of the schools, the probationers attended planned induction programmes provided by their LEAs and in over 85 per cent of cases, the probationary teachers attended meetings organised by the authority. Reporting on the views expressed by the heads of the schools about LEA provision for induction, HMI found: 'A number of heads commented on the abandonment, no doubt in part for financial reasons, of programmes formerly organised by LEAs, while others suggested that current provision was less extensive than it had been. Some authorities had appointed so few probationers in the current year that previous patterns of induction were no longer suitable.'HMI found that the the range of LEA induction provision was very wide, but found it 'at its best' to incorporate the following elements:
'... the inadequacies of as many as a third of those (schools) in the sample may lead to the new teachers failing to achieve their potential - or at least in their doing so more painfully and more slowly.'Overall, the findings of this survey show clearly we believe that there is an urgent need for a major expansion in provision for induction training by both LEAs and schools. General conclusions 3.4 We believe that a comprehensive and structured programme of induction training provided jointly by the LEA and the school is an essential phase in the career development of a newly qualified teacher providing a 'bridge' between the more generalised emphases of initial training courses and the specific demands of a first teaching post. We are concerned therefore that, in the face of financial constraints, the scale of provision at induction level is declining and we hope that steps will be taken to seek to ensure that adequate and effective induction training is offered to all newly qualified teachers. Induction training is clearly important for new teachers who have entered through the PGCE route in view of the shorter time which they will have been able to devote in their training to developing their practical teaching skills, in comparison with BEd students - as HMI concluded in 'The New Teacher in School': '... a programme of induction, desirable as it is for all new teachers, is particularly necessary for the PGCE-trained teachers, with their much shorter base of training, if they are to acquire an early mastery of a range of teaching skills.'The multiracial dimension 3.5 Induction training can play a crucial role in preparing teachers to incorporate a pluralist perspective in their work and to educate their pupils for life in today's multiracial society. Where initial training may have failed to devote sufficient attention to this aspect of a student's development, induction training can, in part at least, serve to set a teacher's work within a school within a broader context. A newly qualified or equally an experienced teacher entering a multiracial school for the first time, will, in our view, need substantial induction training to provide them with the background knowledge needed to offer all pupils an appropriate and relevant education, free from stereotypes of particular minority groups, and to recognise the opportunities offered in a multiracial situation. It must be emphasised that some new teachers joining multiracial schools may not have taken a specialist option concerned with the needs of ethnic minority pupils in their initial training and so may be especially in need of such specific provision. Even where a teacher has undertaken such specialist study or where the core of his or her initial training course has incorporated some reference to ethnic minority needs, it is clear that neither of these forms of 'introductory' provision can, taken by themselves, have adequately prepared that teacher to teach effectively in a multiracial school, unless followed up and supported through induction training. At a specific level, any teacher who finds him or herself faced for the first time with a class which includes a number of pupils for whom, for example, English is not a first language, or whose cultural 'frame of reference' is substantially different from their own, will need particular help and support in responding to the needs of these pupils. Induction training should also help a 'new' teacher to respond positively to any manifestations of intentional or unintentional racism which may occur within the school, including matters such as racist name-calling or graffiti, and to take account sensitively of the variety of backgrounds and experiences of pupils in the actual teaching situation, for example in the choice of textbooks or course materials. The 1974 CRC/ATCDE Report on 'Teacher Education for a Multicultural Society' (see paragraph 2.5 above) set out three broad areas of concern which the induction training of a new teacher working in a multiracial school should cover. We reproduce these below, since, although some of the materials referred to have since been overtaken, these still summarise the major issues which we too believe should be included in induction training: i. an opportunity to examine and discuss material that may be of use. e.g. SCOPE Stages one and two. CONCEPT 7-9, Breakthrough to Literacy, or any material evolved in the locality. This material could be discussed with experienced teachers who are actually using it; the local colleges could provide consultants on language and on particular questions, for example the adapration of the material to different ages and background.3.6 Since in order to be fully effective, induction training must relate directly to the specific character of an individual school or LEA, it is impossible to put forward a detailed 'model' of an ideal programme. In general terms however induction training in multiracial areas and schools should we believe cover the following issues:
3.7 We now consider the range of other forms of in-service training available to teachers in various contexts in the course of their careers. Although we believe that in the longer term we must look to fundamental changes in initial teacher training to bring about the reorientation of education which we have advocated, in view of the limited number of new teachers entering the profession it is clear that in-service training can influence the education offered to pupils now in school in the most direct and immediate way. As HMI has observed (22): 'Certainly the influence of newly trained teachers is highly important, but they will form only a small minority of the teaching force until well on into the 80s. The quality of work in the secondary schools throughout that period will depend largely upon those who are already teaching. Yet the combined effects of falling rolls and economic stringency will make their task the more difficult. Closure or amalgamation of schools, reduction of promotion prospects, an imbalance of staff specialisms within schools may all put strain upon teachers' morale, dampen their vitality and enthusiasm for change and development, and strengthen the tendency towards traditional styles of teaching. Yet new demands will continue to emerge, as changes in society are mirrored by changes in schools, in the curriculum, and in the subjects which contribute to it. In these circumstances further training becomes a necessity rather than a luxury.'In the context of the multiracial nature of British society today and of the pupil populations of many of our schools, we believe this latter comment has added force and justification. The majority of teachers in schools today began their careers before the days of Commonwealth immigration and certainly well before the emergence of the debate about the need for the education of all children to reflect a pluralist perspective. If ethnic minority pupils were referred to at all in their training this was probably in assimilationist or integrationist terms. Whilst a minority of these teachers have kept pace with the debate in educational circles about 'multicultural education' and have updated their knowledge and skills and moved beyond the horizons set for them by their original training, there are inevitably many whose outlook is still determined by a 'traditional' view of their responsibilities. Those teachers who have found their schools becoming increasingly multiracial in character have been particularly anxious to broaden their teaching to incorporate a pluralist perspective, while the majority of their colleagues in 'all-white' schools have tended to retain the view that such matters have no bearing on their work. Nevertheless we believe that in-service training has a major role to play in helping all teachers wherever they teach to fulfil their professional responsibilities more effectively. Early provision 3.8 When the emphasis of educational policy-making in relation to ethnic minority pupils was on assimilationist objectives, the main, and often the only, response of the teacher training system was to offer short in-service courses in multiracial areas focusing on the 'problems' experienced by ethnic minority pupils and intended chiefly for those teachers, especially in the language or 'remedial' fields, who were working with these children. Even the provision of such courses, which were often the only support available to teachers who found themselves faced with large numbers of immigrant pupils many of whom spoke no English at all, was relatively limited. Although the available data are at best somewhat patchy, since many of these courses were arranged on an informal, ad hoc basis, DES Education Survey 13 in 1971 found that only one per cent of teachers in English County Boroughs had attended specific courses related to 'teaching immigrants' between September 1964 and August 1967, and also reported the findings of an HMI survey undertaken in 1968 that in only half of the 40-50 LEAs with a high concentration of immigrants had such courses been organised. 3.9 In-service provision continued to expand gradually however and Townsend found, in his 1971 survey of LEA support for multicultural education (23), that 41 of the then 146 LEAs claimed to be offering in-service courses in this field, although the majority of these were short, part-time courses. LEA-organised courses on the teaching of immigrants in the academic years 1967-1970 were found to have catered for some 5,760 teachers (including of course some 'multiple attendances' by the same teachers). The complementary study by Townsend and Brittan in 1972 of practice in multiracial schools, found that only a total of 7 per cent of staff in the 230 schools studied had attended relevant in-service courses in the three years prior to the survey as shown in the following table:
3.10 At this time the majority of in-service courses offered were still aimed at specialist teachers and tended to recruit only those teachers who were working directly with 'immigrant' pupils such as E2L teachers, rather than their colleagues who were also working in multiracial schools. Indeed Townsend's 1971 survey of LEA provision referred to: '... the considerable difficulty of interesting secondary school teachers in courses on the education of immigrant pupils other than teachers from English or remedial departments.'There was a tendency therefore that even the limited number of courses which were organised were sometimes undersubscribed or even cancelled through lack of interest. It is difficult to ascribe the limited development of in-service training in this field during these early years to any single reason, and clearly the widespread view at the time that the educational needs of these children would be short-lived and could be met quite rapidly through appropriate specialist provision such as language centres, contributed to a feeling that major programmes of in-service provision were unjustified. It may be worth recalling however that the authors of the Institute of Race Relations 1969 report (24) attributed the rather hesitant development of in-service training in this field to: '... the absence of a concerted drive by DES to get courses set up and attended ... first of all (through) a serious attempt to persuade the institutes of education and, through them the colleges, to set up courses; and secondly, some effort to impress upon local education authorities that they should release teachers to attend courses.'Needless to say, little thought was given during these early years to the possible need for in-service provision designed, not just to cater for the specific needs of ethnic minority children, but more generally to enable all teachers to broaden their work to reflect the changed and changing nature of British society. Research studies 3.11 There are no comprehensive and up to date data relating to the provision of in-service training relating to the needs of ethnic minority children or encouraging a broader view of the curriculum for all pupils. There have nevertheless been some studies in this field and we summarise the main findings below, before setting out our own views on the role of inservice training. The HMI inspection exercise undertaken during 1979/1980 and detailed in Annex B found: '... fairly scant treatment of social and cultural issues within inservice provision generally.'with less than half of the institutions studied found to be offering inservice provision and the majority of this concerned specifically with the needs of ethnic minority pupils rather than with the broader implications for education of a multiracial society. Award-bearing courses were found to be particularly popular with both teachers and institutions although the best examples of good practice in HMI's opinion were found in cases where an institution developed: a balanced programme of long and short in-service course provision in close cooperation with its Local Authority's advisory service in multicultural education.'- In their memorandum to the Home Affairs Committee for its 1981 Report on Racial Disadvantage, the National Union of Teachers, on the basis of a survey of all teacher training institutions, expressed concern that: 'A very disturbing feature of our survey was the number of institutions which reported a drop in the take-up of in-service courses for serving teachers in multicultural education; this was blamed on the lack of possibilities for secondment by LEAs.'- Professor Maurice Craft, writing in 1981 (25), reviewed the provision of in-service courses in 'multicultural education' by analysing the courses listed in the DES handbook of long courses for 1981-1982 and found that: '... only 4 out of some 80 institutions in England and Wales specifically mention a multicultural element in their programmes for the in-service BEd degree. But many institutions offer courses in the sociology of education, language, urban and community studies, ethical, philosophical and political issues, and curriculum studies in this award, and multicultural perspectives might occur here or elsewhere. As regards advanced Diplomas, only 10 out of 320 currently listed are specifically related to multicultural education ... As to higher degrees, no single MA/MEd taught course anywhere in England and Wales appears to be devoted to multicultural education.'In relation to short courses, Professor Craft found that, drawing on the 1980 programme of courses to be provided by HMI: '... of 91 courses to be mounted in England between April 1981 and March 1982, only five are to be devoted to topics such as 'teaching and learning in multicultural primary schools.'- The Schools Council survey undertaken by Little and Willey in 1978-1980 and published in 1981 (26), also provided some data on in-service provision. Of the 94 LEAs who responded to the survey, only 29 (less than a third) claimed to be offering in-service courses explicitly concerned with multicultural issues, all but one of these LEAs being areas with a high or medium concentration of ethnic minority settlement. The great majority of the courses offered were on a short (15 weeks or less), part-time basis. A substantial number of authorities claimed however that a 'multicultural dimension' was included in the other in-service courses which they offered. (Further details of the data obtained in this survey are set out in Annex H to this chapter.) The researchers found that: 'The difficulty most often mentioned by other authorities was that of attracting to in-service courses teachers who were thought most to need them. Several authorities said that they were concerned that their courses in practice involved "preaching to the converted".'40 per cent of heads in multiracial secondary schools who responded to the researchers considered school-based courses involving the whole staff of a school to be the most effective form of in-service provision in this field; 30 per cent gave priority to short courses and 28 per cent to courses for subject teachers. The DES Memorandum on Compliance with the EC Directive on the Education of Children of Migrant Workers (referred to in paragraph 2.6) reported that: '... in 1981/1982 over half (53 per cent) of the establishments providing in-service training made specific provision on meeting the needs of ethnic minority children. A further 7 per cent were considering introducing such provision for the first time.'- The major source of data relating to the implications of cultural diversity for in-service training is the 1981 report (27) of the DES funded research project undertaken by a research team based at Keele University and led by Professor John Eggleston. The research team based their findings largely on detailed examination of element courses in the multicultural field, chosen as exemplars of the range of provision currently available, including full-time and part-time, award-bearing and non-award-bearing courses of differing types and duration. The central conclusion of the researchers was that: 'Our investigations have left us in no doubt about the fragmentary and incomplete picture of in-service teacher education for a multicultural society. Indeed it appears non-existent in many areas and in none does it seem wholly adequate.'Whilst the researchers found a good deal of interesting and innovatory work taking place in the in-service field, they observed that: '... the range or provision and its distribution largely arise by the chance incidence of local and even personal initiatives rather than through coordinated policy.'In addition to these broad findings the Keele researchers also discussed at some length specific questions related to the demand for courses, course content and organisation, and follow-up, as well as setting in-service training in the multicultural field within the context of the wider society. We would commend the research report as a whole for its thoughtful and thought-provoking insights and reflections on the state of in-service provision and hope particularly that its 'conclusions' section will be widely read and discussed. There are however several specific conclusions and comments which we would like to draw out here before moving on to consider our own views on the role of in-service training. The researchers found clear evidence of: '... a substantial potential demand for in-service courses for preparing teachers to work in a multicultural society.'This potential demand was not however directly reflected in the actual response to courses, which many course providers considered to be 'sluggish', with unfilled or even cancelled courses. The reasons for this apparent mismatch between potential demand and take-up were considered by the researchers to be the poor and 'spasmodic' communication network in schools which prevented information about courses reaching teachers; the difficulties some teachers faced in securing release or secondment to attend day-time courses; the lack of official 'recognition' given to teachers who had attended these courses, and the failure of course providers to plan courses with teachers. The researchers also found that: '... despite the encouragement from HMI and the teachers' organisations the recruitment of teachers from schools and local authorities with relatively few children from minority groups is largely non-existent.'In considering the content of in-service courses in this field, the research team concluded that: 'It is important that courses should not leave participants with any impression of total understanding, rather an informed position which they can maintain and develop. The diverse and changing aspirations among and between sub-groups within each minority are such that participants can almost never be fully in touch with the complexities involved. Courses should also always caution teachers about the danger of encapsulating children within their own perspectives and perceptions, however sensitive. Courses should also encourage participants to explore alternative styles to learning which may be appropriate to particular children, and to observe successful experiences outside their own classroom which may be incorporated in curricula which develop particular skills. Finally, we reiterate that all those who are concerned with the determination of content and course provision should remember that a keen and sensitive awareness of the needs of all children may be as essential as an awareness of the needs of children from specific ethnic minorities if a sound and well balanced in-service educational provision for a multicultural society is to be developed.'Although the focus of their study was on the in-service provision offered which explicitly dealt with 'multicultural' issues, the researchers interpreted their task rather more broadly and reflected in the following terms on the responsibility which they felt all in-service provision had to incorporate a pluralist perspective: 'Although there is a clear need for further specific courses of inservice education for multicultural situations both at the award-bearing and short course level, this provision should not be seen as an end in itself. These courses can be regarded as but one essential contribution to the fulfilment of a more pervasive need: to make the consideration of multicultural issues more widely available in the general provision of in-service courses for teachers. It is difficult to believe that any in-service course being offered at the present time could properly avoid some consideration of multicultural education. Obvious cases are courses in educational management, guidance and counselling and curriculum development. A multicultural dimension is an inescapable component of the fabric of contemporary educational provision. Indeed we would hope that such a dimension will come to pervade all courses and equally importantly, that all course tutors will have a proper sensitivity and awareness of the area.'In considering the case for a broader approach to the curriculum, and the task for in-service training in particular, the researchers observed that: 'Teachers in their classrooms have found themselves responsible for an increasing part of society's response. Their need for assistance has never been greater. Yet recent studies continue to demonstrate the dearth of detailed consideration of multicultural issues in most schemes of initial training. And since the flow of recruits to the teaching profession has slowed and, in some schools, has ceased altogether, the response becomes more and more the responsibility of the existing teaching force.'Our approach 3.12 The central message of 'Education for All' is that the education offered to all pupils should reflect both the diversity of British society and, beyond this, the interdependence of the world community today. It will be clear therefore that just as we see initial teacher training having a major role to play in offering all new teachers the skills and background knowledge needed to fulfil their professional responsibilities in a genuinely pluralist context, so we would see in-service training as having an equally important and complementary role to play in relation to those teachers already teaching in schools. Permeation of in-service provision We have argued for the permeation of all initial training courses with the principles underlying a genuinely pluralist approach to education; we also believe that all in-service courses, irrespective of level or subject matter, or the character of the area or institution in which they are provided, must reflect the multiplicity of cultures, faiths and languages in contemporary society. All in-service courses should be informed by the broad principles which we would wish to see underlying all initial training courses and which we set out in paragraph 2.13 above. As the Assistant Masters and Mistresses Association has observed (28): 'In the same way that we believe that multicultural perspectives need to inhere in the whole of the school curriculum, they must inform a very wide spectrum of INSET (in-service training), whatever its main purpose. Subject based, pastoral and management courses all need to take account of how their own particular aspects of the education service need to respond to the issues of multicultural living. This is an important way of seeing that (a multicultural) approach ... really does begin to underpin the whole of the school, and also to reach the ears of some teachers who would not choose to go on the more specifically multicultural courses, in the hope of awaking their awareness.'The latter is clearly a particularly important argument in favour of the permeation of all in-service provision, especially in view of our belief that a broader, pluralist approach to education is fully justified on educational grounds, quite apart from the presence of ethnic minority pupils in some schools. It can be seen for example that an in-service course offered to teachers in an 'all-white' area, relating to aspects of history teaching, religious education or social and political studies, would be unbalanced, incomplete and out of touch with the real world, if it did not incorporate an awareness of the present-day character of British society. All providers of in-service training should ensure that all the courses they offer fully reflect a genuinely pluralist perspective and the broad educational principles which we have set out in this report. Training of heads and senior staff 3.13 We should perhaps single out for particular emphasis here the courses to be offered by the National Development Centre for School Management Training at Bristol, since it is clear that the attitude and general level of awareness and understanding of heads and senior staff influences greatly a school's response to this area of development. As the Secretary of State himself observed (29), in announcing the setting up of the National Centre: 'The standards of our schools - academic, moral and cultural - are set by the heads and the senior staff within them. It is essential that they should be fully equipped for the difficult tasks that face them.'We therefore strongly urge that the provision offered by the National Centre, and indeed by other institutions training heads and their senior colleagues, should incorporate a pluralist perspective. Specialised in-service provision 3.14 There is also a range of in-service training provision which is concerned specifically with the educational needs of ethnic minority pupils and the general development of a broader approach to the curriculum. Award-bearing courses This provision takes a wide variety of forms, ranging from long award-bearing courses leading to higher degrees, options within in-service BEd or MEd degrees and advanced diplomas and certificates offered by universities, polytechnics and colleges, to locally organised short courses and workshops and various school-based activities. Each of these types of provision has a contribution to make in enhancing the knowledge and overall awareness of practising teachers to the implications and opportunities of teaching in a culturally diverse society. However we believe that the area of in-service provision with the greatest potential for influencing the largest number of teachers in the most immediate and practical sense is without doubt the wide range of school-based and school-focused activities which have developed in recent years and which we discuss in some detail later in this section (see paragraph 3.22 below). High level, award-bearing courses, especially at MEd level, which include options relating to 'multicultural education' can however we believe also be valuable in attracting senior post-holders from schools including heads and deputies and indeed from other teacher training institutions or from LEA advisory services, who, as we have already observed, can play such a major role in influencing their own institution's or organisation's policies. Such individuals can themselves then act as agents of change in bringing about a fundamental reappraisal of policies and practices in their own institutions in accordance with pluralist principles and thus accelerate the pace of the reorientation of educational provision and teacher training which we have advocated. Advanced diplomas and in-service BEd courses can be equally valuable for senior teachers and heads of departments. At present few institutions offer taught Master's degree courses or in-service BEd courses which incorporate specific major or minor options in multicultural issues. The issues covered by these options range from those relating specifically to the multiracial school - whether in the form of the particular linguistic needs of children for whom English is not a first language, or the approach which can be adopted to certain subject areas in a multiracial classroom situation - or more broadly to the way in which teaching in any school in this country can and must take account of the multiracial social context. We would therefore wish to see a general expansion of provision at this level in order to extend the capacity of the teacher training system to influence the senior, key figures within the education service in the manner which we have outlined here. We believe that there is also scope for the further development of Master's degree courses specifically concerned with the broader concept of 'Education for All' which we have advocated, rather than simply incorporating options in this field, and we would hope therefore that institutions will give consideration to developing such courses in response to this report. Centres of specialism 3.15 There are already a few teacher training institutions, such as Bradford College and the University of London Institute of Education, which have developed particular expertise in the multicultural field in relation to the needs of certain ethnic minority groups and which offer a range of long and short in-service courses. Such centres of specialism will clearly continue to attract those practising teachers who wish to acquire particular skills related directly to the character of their own schools, and can offer advice and support to other institutions wishing to develop their provision in this field. Such institutions may also be able to foster curriculum development and support research initiatives in this field. We would hope to see other institutions developing similar expertise in relation to aspects of 'Education for All' in the future - for example, the findings of Professor Craft's research project on the capacity of institutions to offer provision relating specifically to ethnic minority community languages, summarised in Annex F to our Language Chapter, drew attention to a number of potential 'centres of growth' which we would hope to see develop their provision further. Short courses 3.16 A range of specialist short courses has been developed mainly by LEAs and often in collaboration with teacher training institutions to meet the particular needs of teachers working in multiracial schools. It must be recognised that a course which may last for perhaps only one term part-time can only be regarded as of limited value in itself and should properly be seen as part of a continuing in-service training and curriculum development process. Nevertheless, where a practising teacher wishes to gain further knowledge or skills in a particular aspect of his work, such short courses can be of considerable value. We have already discussed in earlier chapters of this report the particular educational needs which some ethnic minority pupils may experience, and how we feel these needs should best be catered for. For example, we believe that all teachers in schools with substantial numbers of pupils for whom English is not a first language should recognise and accept their responsibility for supporting the linguistic development of these pupils rather than simply regarding this as the role of the language 'specialist'. Apart from such specific issues, there is also a need for teachers in multiracial schools to have a particular level of knowledge and understanding of the religious or cultural character of the community or communities which they serve in order to be able to respond sensitively and positively to any 'pastoral' needs which may arise and to fulfil their responsibilities in relation to home/school relationships. This would of course be true for any teacher in any school in the country, whether 'all-white' or multiracial, but where the cultural 'frame of reference' of a substantial part of a school's pupil population may be markedly different from that of all or most of the staff, it is clear that there may be a particularly pressing need for relevant inservice training of the teachers, and this need can often be met through short course provision. In view of the risks of such 'background' courses establishing or reinforcing negative stereotypes of ethnic minority communities, it is essential that great care and sensitivity is exercised in developing such provision. The majority of LEAs now have advisory committees with the specific task of coordinating and facilitating inservice provision and we hope that these bodies will be particularly responsive to the need to ensure a recognition of cultural diversity. Since in-service short courses, by definition, need to be related directly to a particular area or school, it is difficult to put forward a 'model'. Nevertheless there are three broad principles which we believe should inform provision of this type:
Racism awareness training 3.17 It is important to mention here the limited but increasing number of short in-service courses which have been organised by certain multiracial LEAs and educational organisations in the past few years concerned with what has generally been termed 'Racism Awareness'. Although the diverse activities which have been organised under this broad heading have varied widely, they have generally derived from the Racism Awareness programmes originally devised in the United States, particularly the programme devised by Judy Katz, whose handbook of 'Anti-Racism Training' - 'White Awareness' - was published in the USA in 1978. An example of the type of course which has been organised in this country was the Racism Awareness Workshop organised by the National Union of Teachers in March 1983, the aims of which were set out as follows: 'The workshop is designed for teachers who wish to develop an awareness of the operation of racism in society in general and in the education system in particular at an institutional and personal level. It will be specifically focused around 'white' attitudes and the professional responsibilities of white teachers in a multiracial, multicultural society. It is hoped that through an exploration of the processes involved in 'unlearning' racism, and exercises aimed at strengthening participants' antiracist understanding and techniques, teachers will be provided with information and skills which will help them to make an effective contribution to antiracist strategies in their own schools and colleges.'The objective of Racism Awareness Training is very much in keeping with our own views on the need to acknowledge and challenge manifestations of racism both within education and in society generally at institutional and individual level, and particularly the need for teachers to be prepared to revise their attitudes towards ethnic minorities where these can be seen to be working against the interests of particular pupils or counter to the overall aim of a genuinely pluralist society. It will be clear that we have already stressed the need for in-service training to cover many of the specific elements often involved in Racism Awareness courses - such as studying the origins and operation of racism, the background to today's culturally diverse society and the potential contribution of education to bringing about a racially just, pluralist society - in the rather broader and more positive context of enabling teachers to recognise and fulfil their professional responsibilities in relation to all their pupils more effectively. The development of distinct Racism Awareness courses is still at an early stage with little if any work having yet been undertaken in an 'all-white' context. The majority of the participants so far have been already 'converted' to the aims of multicultural education - the participants in the NUT workshop were for example described as: '... a self-selected group of volunteers with a positive willingness to learn about racism awareness techniques.'- rather than still remaining to be convinced by the course itself. We find ourselves therefore uncertain as to the value of such courses. It may well be that such a short course - most Racism Awareness courses last no more than 10-15 hours - which is concerned so explicitly and directly with the controversial and complex issue of racism, may stand less chance of effectively influencing the attitudes and behaviour of a teacher who has not previously considered this aspect of his or her work, than would a longer and more broadly-based in-service course or school-based activities which set racism within a wider perspective. It may be interesting to note in this context that we understand from some of those who gave evidence to us about the American situation that the trend there in recent years has been away from specific Racism Awareness courses and towards the incorporation of the underlying aims and objectives involved within rather broader course provision. We believe there is an urgent need for research into the various Racism Awareness training programmes which have been devised so far and we would like to see the DES funding an independent evaluation of the content and effectiveness of such courses. 'All-white' dimension 3.18 It will be clear that the type of specific in-service provision which we have discussed is designed primarily to meet the needs of those practising teachers who are actually teaching in multiracial schools. Courses relating to issues such as 'teaching in a multilingual classroom', 'the pastoral needs of Muslim girls', or to the specific background of certain ethnic minority groups in particular parts of the country, can be seen to be of little relevance to the teacher working in an 'all-white' school in an area with little if any ethnic minority settlement. Nevertheless, as we have emphasised throughout this report, the issues raised by 'Education for All' are of equal validity and importance for teachers in such 'all-white' areas, in offering their pupils a full and balanced education, and in also seeking to counter the misleading and negative stereotypes which ethnic majority pupils may have of ethnic minority groups and which contribute to the overall climate of racism. We have already argued that all new teachers should, through their initial training, be brought to an awareness and understanding of the broader multiracial social context in which they will be teaching and of how to prepare their pupils for life in a pluralist society. It is equally necessary to develop this same degree of awareness and understanding amongst those teachers already in schools, including those in ''all-white' areas. As we have seen however, there is virtually no in-service provision currently available which seeks to cater for what is after all still a majority of the existing teaching force - Little and Willey's study reported almost no relevant in-service provision available to teachers in areas with few ethnic minority pupils, and Professor Eggleston and his team found this type of provision 'largely non-existent'. It could be suggested that this gap in provision could be filled by a major extension of existing in-service courses to LEAs and teacher training institutions in 'all-white' areas. This assumes however that the in-service needs of a teacher in an 'all-white' school are the same as those of a teacher in a multiracial school, and, as we have seen, there are in fact clear differences of emphasis and concern in these different contexts. We believe therefore that there is an urgent need to develop appropriate in-service courses across the range of provision, from options in high level, award-bearing courses to part-time, short courses, designed specifically to enable teachers from 'all-white' schools to incorporate a pluralist perspective in their work and to bring their pupils to a positive understanding and appreciation of the multiracial nature of society. Those teachers from 'all-white' schools with whom we have discussed the development of courses along these lines have generally expressed themselves willing and indeed anxious to broaden their horizons through such in-service training. 3.19 It is difficult to set out here what we would regard as the ideal content of such courses for teachers in 'all-white' areas since the opportunities for detailed study and the emphasis of a course will vary according to type and length. We would nevertheless envisage courses covering the kind of information which we have already indicated we would wish to see included in core studies at both initial and in-service level, which can broadly be summarised as follows:
Financial support 3.20 All that we have said up to now has been intended to bring about an extension and development of in-service provision related to our view of 'Education for All'. It could be argued that such an expansion of provision is unnecessary and unjustified since one of the few findings to emerge clearly from the limited research available has been that a proportion of the in-service courses already offered in this field are undersubscribed and some have even been cancelled due to lack of support - at first sight hardly a basis on which to press for more such courses to be organised. However it must be recognised that the major factor in this situation, especially in recent years, is not we believe any lack of interest on the part of teachers, but rather the effects of financial constraints which have led many LEAs to reduce substantially the number of teachers whom they are prepared to release for in-service training because of the costs incurred in providing replacements for them. In order to have any chance of effectively enhancing the level of in-service training available to teachers in this field, it is clear that the expansion of course provision which we have advocated here must therefore be matched by appropriate financial support in order to enable teachers and LEAs to take full advantage of the training opportunities available. In March 1983, the DES announced (30) details of a scheme of direct grants for in-service teacher training under which direct financial assistance is offered by central government to local authorities when serving teachers are released for training on designated courses in any of four priority areas: management training for head teachers and senior staff; mathematics teaching following the report of the Cockcroft Committee (31); pre-vocational education in schools; and special educational needs in ordinary schools. (32) The express intention of this move was to bring about an expansion of inservice provision in these areas - as Circular 3/83 explained: 'When local authorities are considering the release of teachers for inservice training, a major difficulty can be the costs which would be incurred in providing replacements. It is the Secretary of State's intention under this scheme to secure an increase of in-service training in the ... priority areas. The difficulty referred to above would largely be overcome if, as he expects, the grants paid in respect of eligible teachers attending eligible courses are used towards the salary costs of providing replacements for them.' (33)We believe that the in-service training of teachers to fulfil their professional responsibilities in relation to their pupil populations, whether multiracial or 'all-white', and to lay the foundations for a genuinely pluralist society is as much a 'priority area' within teacher training as are the areas of provision so far included in this scheme. We therefore recommend that the government should extend the terms of the scheme to allow for grants to be available to authorities in respect of the release of serving teachers for training on courses relating to aspects of 'Education for All'. Such an extension would require a range of courses to be designated as 'eligible' and we hope that, in drawing up such a list, reference would be made to the broad principles and objectives for inservice training which we have set out in this chapter. Whilst the emphasis will initially be on courses related to the needs of teachers teaching in multiracial schools, we should emphasise that we would wish in the longer term to see in-service courses specifically designed for teachers working in 'all-white' schools becoming eligible for grant, once these have been developed and their effectiveness evaluated. School based activities 3.21 Up to now we have confined our consideration of in-service training chiefly to the provision of taught courses of varying types and levels but nevertheless all 'external' to the individual school. In recent years however, in discussions of in-service training generally, increasing emphasis and attention has come to be devoted to the role of school-based or school-focused in-service support for teachers, and we ourselves believe that such activities have a crucial part to play in enhancing the knowledge and understanding of serving teachers. In considering the potential role of school-based activities, it is important to appreciate that there are two distinct, although clearly interrelated, purposes of inservice training: on the one hand, as a contribution to the professional development of the individual teacher often as a means of gaining promotion or career advancement, possibly at a new school or elsewhere in the education service, and, on the other hand, as an integral part of the enhancement and development of the policies and practices of a school as a whole. We believe that these two functions of in-service training are both important, however, from the point of view of bringing about the reorientation of the education process which we have advocated in this report, the latter is perhaps the more essential. Whilst we certainly wish to see teachers who have devoted time and effort to gaining additional qualifications being given appropriate recognition, if such teachers subsequently take up posts either at another school or elsewhere in the education service, the in-service training involved has in practice proved of little value to their original schools. There must therefore we believe be a central place in any scheme of in-service provision, for activities which take place on a school basis and which can thus involve a whole school staff working together to enhance and develop the teaching which they offer their pupils. As the James Report observed: 'In-service training should begin in the schools. It is here that learning and teaching take place, curricula and techniques are developed and needs and deficiencies revealed. Every school should regard the continued training of its teachers as an essential part of its task, for which all members of staff share responsibility.'The Cockcroft Committee in their report on mathematics education shared this view of the fundamental importance of school-based support in relation to their particular concerns and outlined the inherent strengths of this form of in-service work as follows: 'It can be directed specifically to the needs of the school and its pupils, so that those who teach mathematics develop professionally as a result of working together to improve the work of the school. Above all, it can and should be a continuing process which is not limited to the length of a lecture, a discussion or a course.'These comments are equally applicable to the broader issues with which we are concerned in this report. 3.22 Many of those who gave evidence to us emphasised that they regarded school-based activities as the most important form of in-service provision and as likely to have the most immediate impact on the greatest number of teachers. School-based activities can be seen as the only effective means of influencing those teachers, who may have received their initial training the longest ago and may therefore be most able to benefit from updating of their knowledge and skills, but are the least likely to attend an out of school in-service course although they may be in positions of authority within schools. It is clear that for school-based activities to be effective, they must have the whole-hearted support of heads and senior staff, governors and of the LEA, since indirect costs may be involved through the purchase of materials or possibly the closure of the school for an in-service day or the organisation of an in-service weekend. Although we believe that the range of skill and expertise available from within a school's normal staff has generally been underestimated, it is also however necessary to avoid school-based activities becoming either too narrow and inward-looking or too complacent, if any meaningful appraisal of policies and practice is to take place. An outside catalyst to such activities may therefore be needed either in the form of an adviser or outsider 'expert' or possibly a teacher from another school, or through a member of the school staff attending an external in-service course and then returning to coordinate activities within the school and to pass on the particular knowledge and skills which he or she has gained. In this way structured in-service course provision and school-focused activities can be seen as complementary, and the influence and effectiveness of course provision can be extended and developed far beyond the number of teachers who are able to actually attend courses, which, even with the overall expansion of provision for which we have called, will always remain limited in relation to the overall size of the teaching force. The development of continuing school-based activities can also ensure that a school is able to take full advantage of the additional knowledge which a teacher may gain on a course rather than, as may be the case at present, the effectiveness of a course being diluted in the face of a disinterested or unresponsive school staff. As the HMI discussion paper 'Teacher Training and the Secondary School' observed 'Experience has shown that the stimulating effect of an in-service course on one or two individuals can be neutralised on their return by the inability of the school to respond to it and to take advantage of what they have learned.'Thus school-based developments can not only extend the influence of inservice training courses, but can also create the climate of receptivity and openness needed to allow the knowledge and skills gained to have a positive impact in schools. 3.23 It is clear that school-based activities can be especially valuable in fostering the enhanced awareness of multicultural issues and in developing the pluralist perspective which we have advocated here. This was certainly the emphasis of much of the evidence which we received on teacher training - as one teacher training institution put it to us for example: '... we would see school-based in-service courses as being a necessary and desirable part of any in-service programme. It is essential that all staff in a school are made aware of the need of multiracial education, and are offered immediate and sustained support in the acquisition of skills and the design of strategies appropriate to meeting these needs.'One of the clearest findings to emerge from the Schools Council research project (see paragraph 3.11 above) was the very high percentage - 40 per cent - of heads of multiracial schools who favoured school-based provision involving the whole school staff as the most effective form of inservice provision in this field. Because school-based activities have to be closely related to the resources and needs of an individual school, it is not possible to put forward a 'model' of the kind of programme which we would wish to see schools developing. The issues which all schools, whether multiracial or 'all-white', should consider are however evident from the findings and conclusions which we have reached in this chapter, and we hope that our Report will serve as a catalyst to the self-evaluation and self-appraisal by school staffs of the aims and effectiveness of their work. The following further extract from the HMI discussion paper emphasises the particular role which school-based in-service work can play in focusing teachers' minds on difficult and controversial issues, such as those with which we are concerned, as well as mentioning some of the methods which can be employed in school-based provision: 'It is when a school has come to a decision as to what direction it should develop in, and analysed its training needs, that it can absorb and act upon the effects of that training. The school-focused model will be one of the means by which the institution responds to this self-evaluation. This approach is particularly well fitted to achieve objectives which require a radical change in thinking on the part of the staff. One example is the wider view of the curriculum ... Heads of department can be encouraged to give a lead in forming working groups of teachers from a number of subjects. These might begin by looking at ways in which one subject can provide teaching material for others and draw upon them in turn. They might then work towards identifying particular insights and skills that their subjects have a common interest in developing. Another example is the extension of teaching methods. There are obvious difficulties in persuading experienced teachers that they need to look critically at their own teaching methods. Little will be achieved if school policies to this end are conceived abstractly and handed down as precept. They will fail if they do not take account of the sensitivity of staff who see them as a questioning of their professional competence, or an encroachment upon their autonomy. A school-focused approach is certainly the best form of in-service training to open up teaching methods to critical scrutiny, but its basis should be inductive. Heads of departments need to cooperate to encourage teachers to look at the demands made upon a pupil in subjects other than their own. This will imply a greater readiness to observe and to be observed and to discuss openly the outcomes. A third example is the need for the teacher to continue to broaden his experience of pupil performance and keep his standards and expectations under critical review. In-service work in schools should include the opportunity for collective study of work produced by pupils in response to a variety of demands.There are two particular types of school-based in-service activities which we would especially like to highlight here as having a potentially very important contribution to make. Firstly we would emphasise the need to develop and extend the use of 'distance learning' techniques such as the use by school staffs of taped and video-taped material which can both broaden the expertise available to a school and also widen the horizons of teachers. We are pleased that both the BBC and the IBA have shown an interest in developing appropriate programmes and also that the Open University has already developed some particularly interesting and thought-provoking courses and programmes which would we believe be of great value in stimulating discussion and development within schools. We believe that there is considerable scope for the Open University in particular to further extend its work in this field and we hope that our Report will encourage such an extension. Even more potentially immediate in its impact on schools can however we believe be the development and expansion of schemes for staff exchanges both between schools with similar circumstances and also between schools with widely different characters, such as an urban multiracial school and a rural 'all-white' school. Much has of course been made of the potential value of teachers from multiracial schools visiting the countries of origin of their pupils, and the Caribbean Teacher Exchange Scheme has for some years allowed groups of teachers from schools with pupils of West Indian origin to 'exchange' jobs for a year with teachers from the West Indies. Such exchanges have undoubtedly served to enhance the awareness and understanding of both the teachers and schools involved. The great majority of ethnic minority pupils now in schools are British-born however and since, as we have stressed, we believe that the role of schools cannot be seen as to 'enforce' a particular cultural identity on any child but rather to encourage the development of a child's own identity, which may relate to a British context rather than to their 'ethnic' origins, such exchanges may become increasingly irrelevant to the development of the kind of educational processes which we have advocated. We believe however that there is considerable scope for the development of a centrally-funded scheme to facilitate teacher exchanges, possibly organised through the Central Bureau for Educational Visits and Exchanges, within this country as part of broadening the horizons of all schools to appreciate the different perspectives and opportunities offered in multiracial and in 'all-white' schools for the development of an overall education process which seeks to prepare all pupils for life in a genuinely pluralist society. In-service policy statements and their implementation 3.24 If the changes we are seeking within schools are to be brought about efficiently, we consider it important that each school should develop, in consultation with the LEA and its advisors, a scheme for the in-service education of its teachers, ranging from award bearing courses to short courses and school based activities as appropriate. Such a scheme could form part of the policy statement on 'Education for All' which we consider LEAs should require of each school. To this end, we also consider it necessary that each LEA, in its own policy statement, should commit itself to developing an overall strategy of in-service training for its area which would cover not only the work of teachers but all other members of the education service, for example librarians, careers advisors and educational psychologists. For the implementation of such a policy appropriate funds will need to be allocated to provide not only for the secondment and supply cover for teachers together with related expenses but also for the necessary resources and support services. In each LEA there needs to be provision at teachers' centres of books, materials and facilities together with specialist advice which teachers and LEA personnel can call on as required. In the interests of the economical use of resources it is clear that adequate provision must also be made for the proper evaluation in relation to local needs of the full range of these in-service activities. Training the trainers 3.25 It is clear that the task which we have envisaged for teacher education at both initial and in-service level makes great demands on the teacher training institutions and on individual teacher trainers. It may well be necessary therefore for some teacher trainers to become involved in a process of reappraisal, reorientation and even retraining themselves. As the HMI discussion paper on initial training observed: 'The most carefully planned course of training is still only as good as the people who teach it and the way it is taught ... The professional element in the student's preparation should be taught by people who are successful and experienced members of the teaching profession, up to date in their knowledge of schools and of society, and able to help their students develop an informed empirical approach to their teaching tasks.'The latter point is perhaps even more relevant to the in-service training available to practising teachers since they will clearly be particularly concerned that any provision offered to them relates directly to the realities of the classroom. The contraction of the teacher training system over recent years has however meant that few new lecturers with direct and recent teaching experience, particularly of teaching in multiracial schools are now joining institutions - a point which we drew out in our interim report. As one teacher training institution explained to us in evidence: 'Like so many Schools of Education, new recruitment is non-existent. We are a fast ageing staff: most of us have very little experience of recent teaching in inner city (or outer city!) schools.'One of the solutions to this perceived 'gap' in the experience of teacher training staff, especially in relation to the multiracial teaching situation, has been to involve practising teachers on a regular basis to assist trainers in their work. The NUT supported such initiatives in its evidence to the 1981 Home Affairs Committee: 'The expertise of practising teachers is a valuable resource and colleges should be encouraged in this practice, not only for options and in-service courses, but as a contribution to the 'compulsory' element of the initial course, whether BEd or PGCE ... A more flexible and imaginative use of the secondment of teachers to colleges and college staff to schools, utilising the experience of serving teachers in the training of students, would be beneficial to all concerned.'We would certainly endorse this view, provided the teachers used in this way receive appropriate reward and recognition, since we believe there is a need for far closer links to be developed between schools and teacher training institutions in seeking to complement each other's work. As the HMI discussion document on 'Teacher Training and the Secondary School' acknowledged: 'It has been strongly argued that the balance of influence and authority in initial training should be shifted towards the schools. leading to a partnership very much more equal than at present. Certainly there is room for more instances of teachers working in colleges with students,for example in subject method courses, and of lecturers regarding a regular school teaching assignment as an essential part of their work. It has been remarked of college and school that "the semi-permeable membrane between them should become wholly permeable".'The increasingly widespread opportunities for involving practlsing teachers in the work of teacher training institutions through Teacher Fellowships and Teacher Associateships can clearly also make an important contribution to relating the provision offered more directly to work in schools and can lend added immediacy to courses. We would therefore wish to see such opportunities further developed and extended in the future. The involvement of individual seconded teachers can however only influence some elements in some courses and there is clearly still a need for teacher trainers themselves to seek to develop a pluralist perspective in their work. In some institutions where progress has been made in developing the kind of course initiatives discussed here, the major responsibility for this work has tended to fall on particular individuals who already have a commitment to pluralist objectives or who have some experience in multiracial areas and who have therefore come to be regarded as 'experts' in this field. In seeking to ensure that all courses reflect a pluralist perspective we believe all teacher trainers have a responsibility to ensure that their work is informed by an awareness of the diversity of experiences which make up British society today, over and above any 'specialist' knowledge or skills which certain trainers may need. There is a need for urgent attention to be given to possible ways of providing any additional knowledge or skills, or 'reorientation' needed by teacher trainers to enable them to contribute fully to the preparation of their students to offer an education both appropriate and relevant to today's society. Only very recently has much attention been devoted to this area of 'training the trainers' and developments are consequently at an early stage. We were interested to learn of a national programme of short courses for lecturers and others involved in both initial and in-service teacher education, organised under the auspices of the University of Nottingham, in six teacher training institutions, aimed at developing participants' awareness of the responsibilities of education in relation to today's multiracial society and the implications of this for their work as teacher trainers. We attach further details of the courses being offered by the various institutions, together with details of the second phase, as Annex I to this chapter in order to illustrate the type of issues which are being covered. We understand that the DES is funding an evaluation of the impact of these courses and we very much hope that this will enable HM Inspectorate to draw out 'good practice' in the field of 'training the trainers' and will thus allow for further such course developments in the future. It must be recognised however that, valuable though we believe this initiative is, these courses are somewhat limited in scope and since participation is clearly on a voluntary basis, they can in many ways be likened to specialist optional courses in that they will inevitably attract chiefly those teacher trainers who are already committed to progress in this field and will be unlikely to involve the more senior staff of institutions. Such courses are therefore unlikely, by themselves, to bring about the overall reorientation of teacher training courses which we have advocated here, and it may be necessary in the longer term to look towards the establishment of a designated centre or centres for the retraining of teacher trainers, especially at the more senior level, perhaps along the lines of the recently established National Development Centre for School Management Training.
II The employment of ethnic minority teachers 1. Background 1.1 There has long been concern amongst both ethnic minority communities and educationists that, as the Assistant Masters and Mistresses Association have put it: 'Teachers from ethnic minorities are regrettably and evidently a minority in themselves.'As long ago as 1973 the Select Committee on Race Relations and Immigration, in discussing the potential contribution of teachers of 'immigrant origin', was voicing its agreement with: '... the majority of our witnesses, not least those from local education authorities, that there should be more.'The need for more teachers drawn from the ethnic minority communities has been a recurring theme in discussion of the development of an education appropriate to today's multiracial society - with, for example, the National Association of Teachers in Further and Higher Education in its written evidence to the Home Affairs Committee for its 1981 Report, expressing the view that: 'There is ... a desperate urgency to increase as dramatically and quickly as possible the number of black teachers in Britain's schools.'- and this issue certainly featured prominently in much of the evidence which we ourselves received. Absence of statistical data 1.2 It is clear that ethnic minority groups (by which we would mean the whole range of groups with whom we have been concerned in this report and not only the Asians and West Indians on whom most of the attention in this respect has tended to focus) are disproportionately under-represented in the teaching profession - indeed the DES itself has long accepted this as a legitimate cause for concern. There is however no firm statistical basis for any discussion of the number of teachers of ethnic minority origin and such estimates as have been made in recent years have tended to be both limited in scope and definitionally imprecise - for example, the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE), in its evidence to us, was able only to estimate that: '... there may be 800 or more teachers of West Indian origins and a rather larger number of Asian origins, but no precise figures are available.'Pressure has come from many quarters for detailed statistics to be collected by the DES both of the ethnic composition of the teaching force and also of the ethnic breakdown of students training to be teachers, in order to clarify the actual extent of the under-representation of ethnic minorities in these fields. In their 1977 Report on the West Indian Community (34) the Select Committee on Race Relations and Immigration recommended explicitly that: '... the Department of Education and Science should compile and monitor relevant statistics relating to those students training to be teachers, and teachers in grant-aided establishments, who are of West Indian origin.'Although the then government accepted this recommendation in principle in its 1978 White Paper on the West Indian Community (35), no action was in fact taken to implement it. In our own interim report therefore we ourselves recommended, in relation to the whole range of ethnic minority groups, that: 'The DES should ask all teacher training institutions to collect statistics on the ethnic origin of all students training to be teachers including students seeking to enter teaching through special access courses.'and that: 'The DES should record and publish statistics on the ethnic origin of all teachers in employment ...'The Secretary of State indicated, in giving evidence to the Home Affairs Committee in July 1982, his approval in principle to the collection of ethnically-based statistics in the education field. As we have already observed in Chapter Four, however, no positive action has yet been taken to implement our recommendations in respect of statistics and the terms of reference of the DES's working group on the collection of ethnic statistics do not cover our recommendations in relation to teachers or teacher training students. 1.3 We firmly believe that the collection of the statistical data which we have previously advocated is an essential element in seeking to tackle the important and often controversial issues of the admission of ethnic minority students to teacher training courses and also the recruitment and career advancement of ethnic minority teachers, since such reliable and up to date data would serve to quantify accurately for the first time the extent to which ethnic minorities are under-represented in teaching. We therefore begin this discussion of the role and recruitment of ethnic minority teachers by strongly reiterating our interim report recommendations concerning the collection of statistical data in this field. 2. The case for more ethnic minority teachers 2.1 Irrespective of the absence of detailed statistical data, it is clear that there are disproportionately low numbers of teachers of ethnic minority origin in our schools. We regard this under-representation of ethnic minority teachers as a matter of great concern which merits urgent attention and positive action. As the authors of the second NFER Review of Research have argued: 'If schools are to reflect a multi-ethnic society then not only should their curricula be consciously multicultural but their staff should be conspicuously multiracial too.'Equality of opportunity in employment 2.2 The specific educational justifications for efforts to be made to increase the number of ethnic minority teachers are many and varied and we discuss these further below. Over and above the educational grounds for action, there is the straightforward question of seeking to bring about true equality of opportunity for members of all groups throughout the employment market including the teaching profession. A number of individual teachers of ethnic minority origin as well as the various ethnic minority teachers organisations who gave evidence to us expressed the belief that many qualified ethnic minority teachers have faced racial discrimination in seeking employment and subsequently in gaining career advancement. It has been suggested in particular to us that ethnic minority applicants are less likely than their colleagues from the majority community to obtain permanent posts and are often only able to obtain work as 'supply' teachers and that, even once they have joined a school, they have particular difficulty in achieving professional recognition in the eyes of their colleagues and are unlikely to be promoted beyond perhaps Scale 1 or 2 posts even after some years service. Clearly the absence of firm statistical data makes it difficult to establish the extent of such discrimination but, as the CRE observed in their evidence to us: 'What is most apparent ... is the widespread sense of frustration and bitterness among ethnic minority teachers about what they see as their subordinate and disadvantaged position in the teaching profession.'2.3 Although evidence of actual discrimination is hard to come by, it is clear that ethnic minority teachers have been and are still subject to racism both in gaining employment and in advancing their careers. On our own visits to schools we have been concerned at the number of fully qualified ethnic minority teachers whom we have met who are 'stagnating' in the system, in posts far below both their capabilities and experience. A matter of even greater concern is the number of ethnic minority teachers who, discouraged and disenchanted with the obstacles which they feel have been placed in the way of their progress in the teaching profession, have turned to other forms of employment. We urge both the CRE and all those involved within LEAs and schools in making appointments, to devote far greater efforts to identifying and overcoming racism within the teaching profession. As the CRE itself has commented, in its 1981 guide 'Local authorities and the education implications of Section 71 of the Race Relations Act 1976' (36): 'The mere fact that allegations of discrimination (direct or indirect) are made by members of the teaching profession necessitates unequivocal commitments to equality of opportunity from educational employers; if discrimination in the employment of teachers does not exist it must nonetheless be shown not to exist.'In this respect we welcome the efforts made by some LEAs to establish themselves as 'equal opportunity employers' and we urge al! LEAs to follow this lead and adopt similar public 'equal opportunities' policies. Educational arguments for more ethnic minority teachers 2.4 Turning to the educational arguments for increasing the number of ethnic minority teachers, in its conclusions to a survey published in 1977 (37) the then Community Relations Commission put forward the following four reasons for employing more ethnic minority teachers: 'a. It is desirable for people staffing an educational service to be a natural reflection of the make-up of the population.The multiracial context All these reasons appear to us to remain valid to the present day. As we have already stressed elsewhere in this report, it is undoubtedly true that some ethnic minority teachers can play a particularly valuable 'pastoral' role within a multiracial school both directly, through supporting and encouraging pupils and parents drawn from the same ethnic minority group, and indirectly, through advising their colleagues on the background and concerns of certain ethnic minority groups and ensuring that the practices and procedures of the school as a whole take account of the needs of the communities which they serve. As we have emphasised however, it should never be assumed that each and every teacher of ethnic minority origin will be able or willing to accept this role. As we have stressed in Chapter Seven, the presence of bilingual or multilingual teachers of ethnic minority origin, who share a common 'community language' with pupils for whom English is not a first language, can also greatly enhance the capacity of a multiracial school to respond positively to the linguistic diversity of its pupil population, and can be particularly valuable in a 'pastoral' context in relation to developing the school's links with parents and the wider community. It has also been strongly emphasised to us, especially by representatives of the West Indian community, that ethnic minority teachers can serve as valuable 'role models' for pupils from the same ethnic background, and can thus have a direct effect on the motivation and even the achievement of these pupils. Such an influence can be particularly powerful where the teacher concerned has been born in this country, like the great majority of ethnic minority pupils, and is thus perceived by them as sharing a common background and as having faced and overcome any educational 'hurdles' and succeeded within the system. Against this positive attitude is the view expressed to us by a number of ethnic minority pupils that they felt they had little in common with ethnic minority teachers who had been born and trained overseas and who therefore found it difficult to identify with the problems of identity experienced by British-born ethnic minority youngsters and who tended to be unduly influenced by a rather narrow and stereotyped view of their place in this society. In relation to the multiracial school context, it is also worth noting that on many of our own visits we were struck by the inherent incongruity of 'all-white' teaching staffs, often living well away from the catchment areas of their schools, seeking to meet the needs and respond to the concerns of a multiracial pupil population. Potential contribution to an 'all-white' school 2.5 This should not be interpreted as suggesting that we see a role for teachers of ethnic minority origin only where there are ethnic minority pupils. This is far too limited a perception of their potential role and of the contribution which they can make to the education process. We believe that an ethnic minority teacher can be a valuable asset to any school in the country - whether multiracial or 'all-white'. Ethnic minority teachers may be 'role models' in all-white schools as well as in multiracial schools, in the sense in which their presence may serve to counter and overcome any negative stereotypes in the minds of pupils, parents or teachers from the majority community about ethnic minorities and their place in our society. Where such teachers are able to bring with them a degree of knowledge and personal experience of other cultures, religions and languages this can also be particularly valuable in enriching the 'resources' available in an 'all-white' school and in assisting the staff in perceiving how the school's curriculum can be broadened along genuinely pluralist lines. As the Assistant Masters and Mistresses Association have explained in their booklet 'Our Multicultural Society': '... it could be argued that where a school, because of its monocultural population, has been slow to realise the need to take account of the multicultural nature of society outside the school, then the appointment to it of one or more reachers from ethnic minority groups may well be a useful catalyst. We are nor arguing that teachers from minority groups are in any sense automatically experts in, or even enthusiasts for, the sort of multicultural approach that we advocate. Individuals may or may not be. What we do suggest is that the arrival of such a teacher in a previously monocultural school may cause white colleagues (and pupils) to ask some questions for the first time.'Thus, given the broader approach to the education of all pupils which we have advocated throughout this report, we regard ethnic minority teachers as an integral part of the teaching force in all our schools. Ethnic minority teachers should never be portrayed simply as token figures within a school with just a 'curiosity' value or able only to undertake certain specific tasks, but should be regarded as part of the school's staff, on equal terms with their colleagues from the majority community in participation in the development of policies and in the decision-making process. Recruitment 2.6 We find ourselves in principle opposed to any suggestion of a 'quota' system for increasing the number of ethnic minority teachers, which would in any sense bypass or override the desire of LEAs and schools to employ first and foremost the best candidate for a particular job in terms of expertise, experience and ability, since clearly this would run counter to the educational interests of all pupils. We do not wish to see any diminution of standards. We believe however that far more consideration should be given, in making appointments, to the extent to which a particular ethnic, cultural, linguistic or religious background is an additional and desirable feature for a job in any school - whether multiracial or 'all-white'. Much of a teacher's influence on pupils is of course indirect rather than direct - through the contribution which he or she makes to the ethos of the school and to the 'hidden' curriculum. In any school an ethnic minority teacher may be able to make a particular contribution to the development of policies designed to combat and counter the influence of racism, at both institutional and individual level, by drawing on his or her own personal experience of its effects. Just as we have argued throughout this report for a pluralist approach to be adopted in all schools, an education which seeks to prepare all pupils for life in a pluralist society can surely best be provided by a teaching force which is itself pluralist in character. 3. Sources of ethnic minority teachers 3.1 Having established that it is both desirable and indeed essential to increase the number of ethnic minority teachers in our schools, we now need to consider the question of where such teachers are to be found, since the argument often put forward by LEAs and schools to explain the limited number of such teachers is that ethnic minority candidates simply do not apply for posts and therefore cannot be recruited. Whilst we feel that a major factor in this situation may well be the reluctance of ethnic minority teachers to apply for posts which they feel they will not obtain because of the influence of racism in the appointments procedure which, as we have indicated above, can best be overcome by positive statements by LEAs of policies of equality of opportunity in the employment field, it is also clear that steps need to be taken to encourage more members of ethnic minority groups to enter teaching in the first place. In our view there are three main potential sources for recruiting more teachers of ethnic minority origin:
Teachers with overseas qualifications 3.2 There are undoubtedly, within the various ethnic minority communities, a number of first generation immigrants who trained, qualified and taught in their respective countries of origin but who have either not sought to or have been unable to resume their teaching careers in this country. At first sight such individuals would appear to offer a valuable source of experienced ethnic minority teachers, although, as we have observed above, it must be recognised that some ethnic minority teachers from overseas may find it particularly difficult to relate to British-born ethnic minority youngsters. It must be borne in mind however that qualifications obtained overseas do not necessarily equate with similar qualifications in this country. The procedure followed by the DES in determining whether to grant qualified teacher status to individuals with overseas qualifications was described to us as follows: 'i. The regulations governing recognition as a qualified teacher require a course of training completed elsewhere to be comparable to an approved course of initial teacher training undertaken in England and Wales.It was emphasised to us that applicants are required to themselves arrange for verification of their overseas qualifications direct from the overseas institutions concerned for the DES. Several of the ethnic minority organisations who gave evidence to us expressed some concern about the fact that the procedure for obtaining qualified teacher status could prove both expensive and time-consuming for the individual applicant, and that the criteria used for evaluating the content and comparability of overseas courses were often unclear. Whilst we fully recognise that it is of the utmost importance to ensure that those gaining qualified teacher status are of an appropriate calibre, we recommend that the DES should clarify the arrangements for granting qualified teachers status to members of ethnic minority communities who possess overseas qualifications with a view to encouraging them to enter the teaching profession, as long as this involves no diminution of standards. 3.3 The 1977 Select Committee Report on the West Indian Community recommended that: '... the Department of Education and Science should forthwith consider ways and means of increasing the number of teachers of West Indian origin in maintained schools.''Special access' courses In 1978, in response to this specific recommendation and to the widespread concern about the shortage of teachers from the whole range of ethnic minority groups, the DES invited seven LEAs to establish what have become known as 'special access' courses designed to prepare mature students, particularly but not exclusively from ethnic minority communities, who lacked the normal academic qualifications, to enter training for teaching and other 'caring' professions. Six of the LEAs originally approached have felt able to establish access courses and one additional Authority has also since established them. The DES-sponsored evaluation from 1979 to 1983 of these has indicated encouraging results. (39) We understand from the Project Director, Mr Ken Millins (who was, of course, also previously a member of this Committee) that during the sessions 1979/1980 - 1983/1984 a total of some 1800 students had been admitted to access courses, of whom 51 per cent were of West Indian origin and 5 per cent of Asian origin. A total of 33 institutions are offering access courses, including 17 Colleges of Further Education, 15 Higher Education institutions and 1 Combined Community College, some on a full-time basis and some part-time, with the major emphases being on entry to teacher education or social work and studying the Humanities or Social Sciences. The success rate for all students on access courses preparatory to BEd studies during the sessions 1979/1980 - 1982/1983 was 67.3 per cent, and for all ethnic minority students on these courses during the same period 69.7 per cent. Attached as Annex J is a table taken from the Evaluation Report giving further details of the admission of ethnic minority students from access courses to BEd studies. (It is of course not possible to know how many other former access students may also ultimately enter teacher training through the PGCE route). From these data it can be seen that access courses have enabled a small but nevertheless significant number of ethnic minority students, without the usual entry qualifications, to enter Higher Education and to fulfil a desire to train as teachers. We regard access courses as making an important and valuable contribution not only to offering a 'second chance' for access to Higher Education to ethnic minority students and others who may have previously underachieved and failed to realise their full potential, but also in contributing ultimately to the number of teachers of ethnic minority origin in our schools. We would therefore hope to see an overall expansion of access-style provision to the whole range of Higher Education in the future, not only linked to particular courses or to certain professions but also more generally. We believe that in order to evaluate fully the effectiveness of these courses in the longer term it is essential to monitor closely the continuing progress and performance of those students currently in Higher Education and who may subsequently enter teaching. In April 1984, the Nuffield Foundation agreed to fund a two year follow-up study of the performance of former access students in higher education. We would like to see the DES commission a further project to examine the experience of these students in actually obtaining teaching posts and in fulfilling their responsibilities in schools. 3.4 It is worth mentioning here that we were concerned to learn that some West Indian students who had entered BEd courses through access courses felt that they were regarded by their fellow students and, even more worryingly, by some of their lecturers as 'second-class students' who had entered training through the 'backdoor'. We strongly deplore such attitudes and urge all those institutions currently training students who have participated in access courses to take steps to ensure that such misguided and negative attitudes, when and if they are found, are firmly countered. A major factor in limiting the development and effectiveness of access courses has been financial constraints since students on these courses are not entitled to mandatory awards and are therefore reliant on discretionary awards. At present only two of the LEAs involved provide major discretionary awards for such students. A number of access courses are, as we have mentioned, being provided on a part-time basis in an effort to minimise this problem, but, as the DES acknowledged in its memorandum on access courses to the Home Affairs Committee for its 198 I report: '... even in such cases fees and travelling expenses may deter some students.'In expressing our concern about this situation in our interim report, we recommended that: 'Ways must ... be found to provide mandatory awards for students on these (access) courses.'Although the Secretary of State indicated at the time that he did not feel able to implement this recommendation, we remain firmly convinced that in order for access courses to cater fully for the needs of all those mature students, from both ethnic minority groups and the ethnic majority community, who could benefit from them, these courses must come within the scope of mandatory awards. We therefore reiterate our earlier recommendation in the hope that the Secretary of State will reconsider the position and that positive action will be taken by the government in this respect, thus encouraging both the expansion of provision for access courses and the take-up of existing places. Attitudes of ethnic minority youngsters 3.5 The third, and in our view the most important potential source of ethnic minority teachers in the future are the pupils of ethnic minority origin currently in school who have, or expect to gain, the qualifications needed to go on to Higher Education. Our own discussions with youngsters from a wide range of ethnic minority backgrounds have however revealed that comparatively few of them actually aspire to a career in teaching. The explanations most frequently put forward for this reluctance to consider a future in teaching were that:
Relationship with underachievement 3.6 The major obstacle to seeking ethnic minority teachers, especially of West Indian origin, from amongst the ethnic minority children now in school is however above all that as long as such pupils continue to underachieve in academic terms, as is the case at present, they will lack the necessary qualifications for entry to teacher training (other than of course through access courses). As Dr Willey has quite rightly observed therefore in his draft report on teacher training: 'The main continuing need is to ensure that mainstream education provides minority ethnic group pupils with the qualifications and motivation to enter teacher training through the normal channels.'This adds further weight to the policies which we have advocated in this report to counter the underachievement of ethnic minority pupils and to seek to ensure that they are able to fulfil their true potential.
III Main conclusions and recommendations Teacher education We believe that all initial teacher training courses, both PGCE and BEd, should be permeated with the principles underlying a genuinely pluralist approach to education (Paragraph 2.12); Consideration should be given to pluralist issues within the central and compulsory 'core' of all initial training courses, both PGCE and BEd (Paragraph 2.16); Specialist optional courses relating to pluralist issues should continue to be offered within both PGCE and BEd courses (Paragraph 2.21); Efforts should be made by all teacher training institutions to ensure that all their students, whether on BEd or PGCE courses, have an opportunity of gaining some practical experience in a multiracial school (Paragraph 2.22); We urge the Secretary of State to ask the new Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education to pay particular attention to the need to incorporate a pluralist perspective in all initial teacher training courses in their forthcoming review of provision (Paragraph 2.24); The CNAA and universities responsible for initial teacher training should continue to support and encourage the development of a pluralist perspective throughout teacher education (Paragraph 2.26); We believe that there is an urgent need for a major expansion in provision for induction training. All induction training in multiracial areas should incorporate the background information and skills needed to respond positively and sensitivity [sensitively?] to the particular educational needs which ethnic minority pupils may have and to utilise the opportunities offered by a multiracial classroom (Paragraph 3.3 and 3.5); All in-service courses should reflect the multiplicity of cultures, faiths and languages in present day society. All providers of in-service training should ensure that the courses they offer have this pluralist perspective and embody the essential principals of 'Education for All' (Paragraph 3.12); The courses offered by the National Development Centre for School Management, and by other institutions training heads and senior staff, should incorporate a pluralist perspective (Paragraph 3.13); The coverage of 'multicultural' issues within high level, award-bearing courses should be expanded, in order to extend the capacity of the teacher training system to encourage the senior, key figures within the education service to an understanding of the implications, opportunities and responsibilities of teaching in a culturally diverse society so that they would be in a position to act as 'agents of change' within their own organisations and institutions (Paragraph 3.14); We recommend the development of a number of teacher training institutions as 'centres of specialism' for work concerned with the needs of ethnic minority pupils and the implications of cultural diversity for 'all-white' schools (paragraphs 3.15 and 3.19); Short course provision relating to the particular educational needs which may arise in multiracial schools should be expanded (Paragraph 3.16); We recommend that the DES should fund an independent evaluation of the content and effectiveness of the various Racism Awareness Training programmes which are currently available (paragraph 3.17); The DES should establish a series of 'pilot projects', involving teacher training institutions and LEAs and schools in 'all-white' areas, designed to develop and disseminate 'good practice' across the range of provision from high level, award-bearing courses to part-time, short courses, intended specifically to enable teachers in 'all-white' schools to incorporate a pluralist perspective in their work and to bring their pupils to a positive understanding and appreciation of the multiracial nature of society (paragraph 3.18); We recommend that the In-Service Teacher Training Grants Scheme should be extended to allow for grants to be available to authorities in respect of the release of serving school teachers for training on courses relating to aspects of 'Education for All' (paragraph 3.20); Particular attention should be given to the development of school-based in-service support for teachers in developing an enhanced awareness of the implications of cultural diversity for their work (Paragraph 3.23); Efforts should be made to develop and extend the use of 'distance learning' techniques in relation to in-service teacher training, especially in 'all-white' areas. The broadcasting authorities and the Open University can play a particularly important role in this regard (Paragraph 3.23); The DES should consider initiating the development of a centrally-funded scheme to facilitate teacher exchanges, possibly organised though the Central Bureau for Educational Visits and Exchanges, within this country, especially between multiracial schools and 'all-white' schools, to foster greater understanding and appreciation of the various dimensions of our multiracial society (Paragraph 3.23); We recommend that each school should develop, in consultation with the LEA and its advisors, a scheme for the in-service education of its teachers. Such a scheme could form part of the policy statement on 'Education for All' which we consider LEAs should require of each school. (Paragraph 3.24); Efforts should be made to develop closer links between schools and teacher training institutions, for example through the secondment of practising teachers to assist teacher trainers in their work, in order to ensure that the training offered takes full account of the realities of the present-day classroom situation, including teaching in a multiracial context (paragraph 3.25); HM Inspectorate should issue guidance on provision for 'training the trainers' in relation to the demands of today's multiracial society, drawing on the findings of the DES evaluation of the current initiative organised under the auspices of the University of Nottingham in this field (Paragraph 3.25); The employment of ethnic minority teachers We reiterate our interim report recommendations that: The DES should ask all teacher training institutions to collect statistics on the ethnic origin of all students training to be teachers including students seeking to enter teaching through special access courses.(paragraph 1.3); We regard the under-representation of ethnic minorities in the teaching profession as a matter of great concern which calls for urgent attention. We believe that ethnic minority teachers (and would-be teachers) have been and are still subject to racial prejudice and discrimination, both in gaining employment and in advancing their careers. While we do not support positive discrimination e.g. quotas and do not wish to see any diminution of standards, we urge both the CRE and those involved within LEAs and the schools in making appointments, to devote far greater efforts to identifying and overcoming racist obstacles to the employment and advancement of ethnic minority teachers. (Paragraphs 2.1, 2.3, 2.6); We welcome the efforts made by some LEAs to establish themselves as 'equal opportunity employers' and we urge all LEAs to follow this lead and adopt similar 'equal opportunities' policies (Paragraph 2.3); We believe that an ethnic minority teacher can be a valuable asset to any school in the country - whether multiracial or 'all-white'. In a multiracial context, some ethnic minority teachers can play a particularly valuable 'pastoral' role through supporting and encouraging pupils and parents drawn from the same ethnic minority group, and through advising their colleagues on the background and concerns of certain ethnic minority groups and ensuring that the practices and procedures of the school as a whole take account of the needs of the communities which they serve. The presence of bilingual or multilingual teachers of ethnic minority origin, who share a common 'community language' with pupils for whom English is not a first language, can also greatly enhance the capacity of a multiracial school to respond positively to the linguistic diversity of its pupil population. Ethnic minority teachers can serve as valuable 'role models' for pupils from the same ethnic background. Ethnic minority teachers may also be 'role models' in 'all-white' schools in the sense in which their presence may serve to counter and overcome any negative stereotypes in the minds of pupils, parents or teachers from the majority community about ethnic minorities and their place in our society. Where such teachers are able to bring with them a degree of knowledge and personal experience of other cultures, religions and languages this can also be particularly valuable in enriching the 'resources' available to the school (paragraphs 2.4 and 2.5); Ethnic minority teachers should never by portrayed simply as token figures within a school with just a 'curiosity' value or able only to undertake certain specific tasks, but should be regarded as an integral part of the school's staff, on equal terms with their colleagues from the majority community in participation in the development of policies and in the overall decision-making process (Paragraph 2.5); We recommend that the DES should clarify the arrangements for granting qualified teacher status to members of ethnic minority communities who possess overseas qualifications, with a view to encouraging them to enter the teaching profession, as long as this involves no diminution of standards (Paragraph 3.2); Access courses make an important and valuable contribution not only to offering a 'second chance' for access to Higher Education to ethnic minority students and others but also by contributing to the number of teachers of ethnic minority origin in our schools. We would therefore hope to see an overall expansion of access-style provision to the whole range of Higher Education in the future (Paragraph 3.3); We recommend the DES commission a research project to examine the experience of former access students in obtaining teaching posts and in fulfilling their responsibilities in schools (Paragraph 3.3); We remain firmly convinced that in order for access courses to cater fully for the needs of all those mature students from both ethnic minority groups and the ethnic majority community, who could benefit from them, these courses must come within the scope of mandatory awards. We therefore reiterate our interim report recommendation that: The DES should find ways in which mandatory awards can be given to students on special access courses.(paragraph 3.4) In our view the most important potential source of ethnic minority teachers in the future is the ethnic minority pupils currently in school. Careers teachers and careers officers, with the strong support of DES and HMI, should encourage ethnic minority youngsters to consider the possibility of entering teaching (paragraph 3.5).
References (1) 'Racial Disadvantage'. Fifth Report of the Home Affairs Committee. HC 424-1. HMSO. July 1981. (2) DES Statistical Bulletin 14/83. 'Teachers in service and teacher vacancies 1982-1983'. September 1983. (3) 'Teaching Quality'. Cmnd 8836. HMSO. March 1983. (4) Quoted in 'The Education of Immigrants'. Education Survey 13. HMSO. 1971. (5) 'Organisation in Multiracial Schools'. Townsend and Brittan. NFER. 1972. (6) Extract from a statement issued by the NCCI after a seminar held in January 1967. (7) 'The Problems of Coloured School-leavers'. Report from the Select Committee on Race Relations and Immigration. HMSO 413-1. July 1969. (8) 'The Education of Immigrants'. Education Survey 13. HMSO 1971. (9) Report of the Committee on 'Teacher Education and Training'. HMSO. 1972. (10) 'Education'. Report of the Select Committee on Race Relations and Immigration. HMSO 405-1. July 1973. (11) 'Teacher Education for a Multicultural Society'. CRC/ATCDE. June 1974. (12) 'Developments in the BEd Degree Course - A Study based in 15 Institutions'. HMI Matters for Discussion No. 8. 1979. (13) 'Multicultural Teacher Education in the United Kingdom: a Survey of Courses and other Provisions in British Institutions of Higher Education'. Cherrington and Giles. CRE. 1979. Unpublished. (14) Appendix 20. 'Racial Disadvantage'. Home Affairs Committee Report. HC 424 - IV. HMSO. July 1981. (15) 'The New Teacher in School'. HMI Matters for Discussion No. 15. HMSO. 1982. (16) Memorandum on Compliance with Directive 77/486/EC on the Education of the Children of Migrant Workers. DES. March 1983. (17) 'Multicultural Britain: The Preparation of Teachers'. Dr R Willey. CRE Advisory Group on Teacher Education. Forthcoming. (18) 'Teaching in Schools: The Content of Initial Training'. AN HMI discussion paper. January 1983. (19) DES Circular No 3/84. 13 April 1984. (20) 'Education: A Framework for Expansion'. Cmnd 5174. HMSO. 1972. (21) Detailed in DES Statistical Bulletin 9/80 'Induction and In-service Training of Teachers serving in maintained schools and Further Education establishments in England and Wales: 1979 Survey'. August 1980. (22) 'Teacher Training and the Secondary School'. HMI. 1981. (23) 'Immigrant Pupils in England. The LEA Response'. HER Townsend. NFER. 1971. (24) 'Colour and Citizenship - A Report on British Race Relations'. EJB Rose et. al. 1969. (25) 'Teaching in a Multicultural Society: The Task for Teacher Education'. The Falmer Press. 1981. (26) 'Studies in the Multi-ethnic Curriculum'. Little and Willey. Schools Council. 1981. (27) 'In-Service Teacher Education in a Multiracial Society'. Eggleston, Dunn and Purewal. 1981. (28) 'Our Multicultural Society: The Educational Response'. AMMA. 1983. (29) DES Press Notice 283/82. 6 December 1982. (30) DES Circular 3/83 'The In-Service Teacher Training Grants Scheme'. 31 March 1983. (31) 'Mathematics Counts'. Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of Mathematics in Schools. HMSO. 1982. (32) The DES subsequently added four new priority areas for inclusion in the scope of the scheme: science education; a special programme of support relating to the introduction of the General Certificate of Secondary Education; craft, design and technology teaching in schools; staff development in further education, and the updating of staff on work-related courses. (33) The Scheme relates to teachers who are currently in full-time, permanent employment at maintained ordinary or special schools, and who have been so employed for an aggregate period of at least five years. The eligible courses should not involve attendances for longer than a period of 12 months' duration and should involve at least 20 days' attendance on what would normally be working days for the teachers concerned. Circular 4/84 included provisional estimates of the grants allocated to each LEA calculated on the basis of its compulsory school age population. The grants will cover, on average, 90 per cent of the salary costs of teachers released for in-service training. The remaining 10 per cent will be met by local education authorities. The government has issued details of those courses considered eligible for grant aid - Teacher Training Circular Letter 2/84 - although attendance at other courses relating to the priority areas may exceptionally be considered eligible. (34) 'The West Indian Community'. HC 1801. 1977. (35) 'The West Indian Community'. Home Office. Cmnd 7186. 1978. (36) Section 71 of the Race Relations Act, 1976 states that: 'Without prejudice to their obligation to comply with any other provision of this Act, it shall be the duty of every local authority to make appropriate arrangements with a view to securing that their various functions are carried out with due regard to the need:(37) 'The Education of Ethnic Minority Children from the perspective of Parents, Teachers and Education Authorities'. CRC. 1977. (39) 'Access Studies to Higher Education. September 1979 - December 1983'. A Report to the DES by Mr PKC Millins. January 1984. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||